Rated Care Homes

Park House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Outstanding in 2016, most recently Good in June 2025.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 33 of 39

    rated care homes in Redcar and Cleveland are rated Good, like this one.

Park House: inspection record

Care home, 57 beds, Redcar and Cleveland

Rated Good in June 2025.

Park House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Moorlands Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Belmont View Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Guisborough Manor Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Gracelands Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Castle Dene Care Home Good, 2.8 miles away

See all care homes in Redcar and Cleveland

See all care homes in Guisborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 June 2025 (assessment visit 22 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 13 May to 14 May 2025. This assessment was carried out in response to information of concern received about the service relating to care and treatment and staffing. We did not find evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from these concerns. Park House is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 54 older people, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 55 people living at the care home.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was unannounced and was carried out by 2 inspectors and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Prior to the assessment we reviewed information we had received about the service. We sought feedback from health and social care professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the assessment we spoke with 23 people and relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with staff including the registered manager, deputy manager, senior care staff, care staff, housekeeping and catering staff. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We reviewed a range of records. This included people’s care and medicine records. We looked at staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service were reviewed.

People were supported by staff who had the knowledge and confidence to identify safeguarding concerns and acted on these to keep people safe. When people had near accidents or incidents these were reported, recorded and monitored to look for trends or themes and ensure lessons were learned.

People received individualised care from staff who had the skills knowledge and understanding to carry out their roles. People received care and support from staff who knew them well. We observed people being treated with kindness and compassion in their day to day care.

Systems were in place for the safe storage, administration and disposal of medicines. Records showed people received their medicines as prescribed and in their preferred manner. The service worked with other health and social care professionals to ensure people had access to healthcare services to maintain good health.

Appropriate systems were in place to protect people from the spread of infection. During the assessment we observed the home to be clean, tidy and odour free.

Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the quality of service being delivered. Plans were in place to ensure improvements to the service were identified and appropriate actions taken. People and their relatives were encouraged to provide feedback on the service and complaints were dealt with in line with the provider's policy.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jennifer Draper
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 10 February 2021. Latest assessment published 12 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
HC-One No.2 LimitedBrand: Welltower
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05217764 (opens Companies House)

HC-One No.2 Limited runs 30 services in England, 25 of them in the North East. 29 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by HC-One No.2 Limited

  1. O
    Eastbourne House Outstanding. Care home, North Tyneside
  2. O
    Eden House Outstanding. Care home, County Durham
  3. O
    Falstone Court Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Sunderland
  4. G
    Acomb Court Good. Care home, Northumberland

See all 30 services run by HC-One No.2 Limited

Getting help from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Park House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Park House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Park House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 57 beds at Park House.
When was Park House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Park House was published on 12 June 2025.
Who runs Park House?
Park House is run by HC-One No.2 Limited. It runs 30 services in England, 25 of them in the North East.
What is Park House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 June 2025.