West Lancashire Short Break Services
- Care home
- 6 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2012
- Lancashire, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Good.
13 months
since the latest rating was published.
306 of 381
rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.
West Lancashire Short Break Services: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2025, down from Outstanding.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Elm House Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Beacon View Home for Older People Good, 0.3 miles away
- – EUNOIA-LIVING - 29 The Winsters Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- RI Stocks Hall Nursing Home - Skelmersdale Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Birch Green Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 September 2025 (assessment visit 11 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 15 to 24 July 2025 . This service provided short breaks to adults living with physical disabilities or learning disabilities, and autistic people.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is someone who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service, and be legally responsible for the quality and safety of care provided and compliance with regulations. At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post, but a new manager had been employed and had applied to register.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take from granted.
Incidents were learnt from, safeguarding processes were robust, and action was taken following behavioural incidents to minimise the risk of reoccurrence. Staff supported people through their transition to ensure continuity of care. The environment was designed to support the delivery of safe care and was found to be clean and hygienic. There was generally enough safely recruited and trained staff to meet people’s needs. Systems in place ensured medicines were managed safely.
The service involved people and relatives in creating and reviewing support plans, and staff had a good understanding of current good practice and standards. Information sharing between the team, relatives and other services was good. Staff encouraged people to make healthier choices and supported people to achieve positive outcomes. Staff sought consent prior to care interventions.
Staff treated people, relatives and partners with kindness and respect and knew people, their needs and preferences well. People were supported to use the sensory room or access meaningful activities. Staff understood when people were in pain or distress and acted quickly to minimise this. Workforce wellbeing was prioritised and staff felt valued.
The service ensured care was person-centred and staff understood the needs of people with learning disabilities and autistic people, working flexibly with relatives and other services. Clear and transparent information about the service was shared with people and their relatives, and the manager took the time to listen and respond to feedback. The provider ensured excellent equity in access and staff had a good understanding of equality and diversity. People were offered support to help them prepare for important life changes.
There was a positive and caring culture and managers led by example. Staff were encouraged to speak up and were treated fairly. The service worked closely with other local services to share learning and resources. There was good oversight at the service, and the manager expressed a commitment to improving the service and people’s experience.
However, information in people’s support plans and risk assessments was not always robust or contemporaneous, and records relating to consent required a review.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sarah Oliver
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 17 October 2017. Latest assessment published 4 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Lancashire County CouncilBrand: Lancashire County Council
- Ownership type
- Organisation
Lancashire County Council runs 32 services, all in the North West. 27 are rated Good or Outstanding and 5 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Lancashire County Council
- O Lancaster and Morecambe Short Breaks Service Outstanding. Care home, Lancashire
- O Meadowfold Hyndburn Ribble Valley Short Break Outstanding. Care home, Lancashire
- G Beacon View Home for Older People Good. Care home, Lancashire
- G Bowgreave Rise Home for Older People Good. Care home, Lancashire
Getting help from Lancashire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Lancashire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 6720. Out-of-hours emergencies: 0300 123 6722
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Lancashire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does West Lancashire Short Break Services provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists West Lancashire Short Break Services as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does West Lancashire Short Break Services have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at West Lancashire Short Break Services.
- When was West Lancashire Short Break Services last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for West Lancashire Short Break Services was published on 4 September 2025.
- Who runs West Lancashire Short Break Services?
- West Lancashire Short Break Services is run by Lancashire County Council. It runs 32 services, all in the North West.
- What is West Lancashire Short Break Services's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 September 2025.
Contact
- Address
- 7 School Lane, Skelmersdale, WN8 8EH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Elm House Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Beacon View Home for Older People Good, 0.3 miles away
- – EUNOIA-LIVING - 29 The Winsters Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- RI Stocks Hall Nursing Home - Skelmersdale Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Birch Green Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away