Rated Care Homes

Elm House Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 306 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

Elm House Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 34 beds, Lancashire

Rated Good in July 2025, up from Inadequate.

Elm House Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Beacon View Home for Older People Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    EUNOIA-LIVING - 29 The Winsters Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Stocks Hall Nursing Home - Skelmersdale Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Birch Green Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 July 2025 (assessment visit 16 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 and 25 June 2025. We conducted an assessment to check compliance against breaches of regulations found at the previous assessment. Elm House Care Home is a residential care home providing support to older people, people with a physical disability and people who may have a sensory impairment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were protected from the risk of harm. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs and were clean and well-maintained. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. However, some improvements were still required to make sure medicines were managed safely. The provider had begun to embed a better learning culture, and the registered manager investigated incidents.

People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care to support good outcomes and smooth transitions when moving between services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Although the manager conducted assessments, and regularly reviewed people’s needs, some improvements were needed to make sure care was based on latest evidence and good practice, and to make sure that staff consistently monitored people’s health outcomes.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Governance processes had been strengthened although were still being embedded. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, consent and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

This service has been in Special Measures since 9 December 2024. The provider demonstrated improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The provider was no longer in breach of the legal regulation regarding safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    The provider was no longer in breach of the legal regulation regarding consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was no longer in breach of the legal regulation regarding good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 2 December 2023. Latest assessment published 29 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09095611 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elm House Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Elm House Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Elm House Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 34 beds at Elm House Care Home.
When was Elm House Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elm House Care Home was published on 29 July 2025.
Who runs Elm House Care Home?
Elm House Care Home is run by Elm House (UK) Ltd.
What is Elm House Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 July 2025.