Rated Care Homes

Burrows House

Care home, Bromley, 54 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Burrows House: inspection record

Care home, 54 beds, Bromley

Rated Good in October 2026.

Burrows House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2017. Rated Requires improvement in 2017, then Good in 2018 and October 2026.

The latest rating was published this month.

How it compares locally

  • One of 37 Good care homes in Bromley, out of 41 with a rating.
  • Larger than 8 in 10 care homes in Bromley.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 October 2026 (assessment visit 1 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Burrows House is a 'care home'. The service supports older people and people living with dementia. Burrows House accommodates up to 54 people. There were 51 people living at the home at the time of our inspection.

We carried out this assessment on 5 and 14 October 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

Read the full summary

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the principles of MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Appropriate recruitment checks had taken place before staff started working at the service. Risks to people had been assessed to ensure their needs were safely met. A staff member told us, “Where people are at risk of falls, we keep a close eye on them, we make sure they have access to walking aids, and they are wearing the right footwear.” There were safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures in place and staff had a clear understanding of these. People had access to health care professionals when they needed them, and they received their medicines when needed. The provider made sure the environment and equipment used was safe and regularly serviced, for example, on the fire alarm system, emergency lighting, portable appliances and gas safety.

The provider had used referral information from local authorities, health professionals and people’s relatives to create care plans and risk assessments which outlined their individual care and support needs. Care records included people’s life histories, plans that described their health and social care needs and guidelines for staff on how to best support them with their needs. People were supported to manage their health and wellbeing to maximise their independence. Staff told us how they promoted people’s privacy, dignity and independence by making sure doors and windows were closed and gaining consent from people before supporting them with personal care. People were encouraged to do what they could for themselves and make choices, for example with what they wanted to wear, eat and the activities they took part in. The service employed 2 activities coordinators. We saw an opera singer’s performance and observed an activities coordinator making cakes with people on National Cake Baking Day.

The registered manager demonstrated good knowledge of people’s needs and the needs of the staffing team. There were systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service, and any learning was identified and acted on. The registered manager and staff had received certificates of appreciation from the local authority in 2026 for the manager, team, worker and dignity in care awards for older people’s care homes.

Staff spoke positively about the support they received from the registered manager and deputy manager, highlighting good training, career development opportunities and overall job satisfaction. One staff member told us, “The registered manager has supported me greatly with my career development, if I need anything at all she is there for me.” Another staff member said, “I get very good support from the managers. I get good training and I am very happy working here.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Burrows House
Address12 Derwent Road, Penge, London, SE20 8SW
NeighbourhoodPenge, Bromley
Phone020 8778 2625
Registered managerMaryam Timamy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Dementia
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 3 inspection reports, latest 30 October 2020 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 26 October 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Burrows House
ProviderGCH (North London) LtdBrand: Gold Care Homes
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number10555677 (opens Companies House)

GCH (North London) Ltd runs 3 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by GCH (North London) Ltd

  1. G
    Drayton Village Care Centre Care home with nursing, Hillingdon
    Good
  2. RI
    Peregrine House Care home, Haringey
    Requires improvement

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Qualities Services Ltd Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Qualities Services Ltd - 17 Kings Road Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    High View Care Services Limited Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Oatleigh Care Ltd Care home, 0.3 miles away
    Good
  5. –
    Acacia Care Centre Care home with nursing, 0.5 miles away
    Not yet rated

See all care homes in Bromley

Getting help from London Borough of Bromley

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Burrows House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Burrows House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Burrows House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 54 beds at Burrows House.
When was Burrows House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Burrows House was published on 26 October 2026.
Who runs Burrows House?
Burrows House is run by GCH (North London) Ltd. It runs 3 services in London.
What is Burrows House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 October 2026.