Rated Care Homes

Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 31

    rated care homes in Peterborough are rated Good, like this one.

Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 105 beds, Peterborough

Rated Good in May 2025.

Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Ashlynn Grange Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Elliot Avenue No overall rating, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Cherry Blossom Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Thorpe Wood Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    St Margarets Care Home Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Peterborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 May 2025 (assessment visit 10 September 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre is a ‘care home’ and is registered to accommodate up to 105 people. The service provides accommodation within 5 individual units for people who have high dependency complex care needs, people in need of neurological rehabilitation, and people who are living with long term neurological conditions and early onset dementia. There were 104 people living at the service at the time of this assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment took place from 15 October 2024 to 14 January 2025. We visited the care home on 15 October, 21 October and 29 October 2024. This assessment was planned in response to concerns raised about the safety of people and the management and governance systems in place. We did not identify any significant issues during this assessment and the service remained rated Good. Areas we identified for improvement were acted upon during the assessment timeframe and systems and processes were further developed.

This assessment was undertaken by 4 inspectors and 1 specialist medicines inspector. Further support was provided by 1 Specialist Advisor who was a registered nurse, and 2 Experts by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

People received safe care, staff identified and managed risks safely, responsibly and effectively. People, their relatives and staff told us they felt confident to raise concerns and these would be responded to by the management team. Effective processes were in place with external professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. People were effectively and safely supported to have safe transitions between services.

Staff and managers knew people well. Staff received employment checks, training and ongoing supervision for their roles. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and open culture at the care home. People were encouraged to remain as independent as possible, and were supported with rehabilitation needs by the providers own multidisciplinary staff team of health professionals. The registered manager and provider were open and transparent throughout the assessment process and showed dedication to improving their care and support services, where possible, by being regularly involved in new initiatives and working in line with best practice guidance.

At the time of writing this report, the provider had 2 registered managers registered with the Care Quality Commission. During our assessment timeframe, 1 registered manager left their post. Therefore, all comments within this report relate to the registered manager who remains in post.

  1. Safe

    Good

    People told us they felt safe. Staff had completed safeguarding training. Policies and procedures were in place and staff understood how they could report concerns outside of the care home if needed. Whilst we did find 3 incidents had not been reported to safeguarding, we found the registered manager acted promptly and no further actions were required.

    Safe systems were in place to manage risk, and the care home was clean. We identified some improvements were required to medicine processes, and these were acted upon promptly by the registered manager.

  2. Effective

    Good

    People’s health and care needs were assessed to ensure the service could meet their needs. People were supported by staff who had received comprehensive training to provide effective support. Staff worked with other health professionals to ensure people received the right care and treatment. Staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act and were aware of the importance of choice and consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    We observed staff had positive interactions with people and spoke about them in a kind and respectful way. People’s individual preferences and needs were sought and understood by staff. Guidance was available for staff to respond to people’s immediate care needs to reduce the risk of avoidable distress or discomfort. Staff told us they felt the provider had very good systems and processes in place to support their wellbeing and development.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Care records were detailed and reflected people’s needs. Whilst we found more detail was required for some specific health care and communication plans, overall the care records demonstrated a person-centred and detailed approach to care planning. This meant staff were meeting people’s needs in a consistent way. People were offered meaningful activities and engagement, which was mostly provided on a 1:1 basis due to the support needs of people. However, larger activities were planned for and took place.

    A complaints procedure was available, and people and their relatives told us they were confident to speak with staff. Information was available in different formats dependent upon communication needs. People’s end of life decisions had been recorded in their care plans.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    The provider had a range of policies and procedures that guided staff on how to support people in a safe, effective, caring and responsive way. The registered manager and nominated individual promoted an open and positive culture at the care home. This allowed the service to consistently learn and further improve outcomes for people.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Priscilla Masvipurwa
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing, Rehabilitation services
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

11 inspection reports, latest 11 February 2022. Latest assessment published 12 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03936122 (opens Companies House)

PJ Care Limited runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by PJ Care Limited

  1. G
    Bluebirds Neurological Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Milton Keynes, South East
  2. G
    Mallard House Neurological Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Milton Keynes, South East

Getting help from Peterborough City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 105 beds at Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre.
When was Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre was published on 12 May 2025.
Who runs Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre?
Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre is run by PJ Care Limited. It runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England.
What is Eagle Wood Neurological Care Centre's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 May 2025.

Contact

Phone
01733 516300
Address
Bretton Way, Peterborough, PE3 8DE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Ashlynn Grange Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  2. –
    Elliot Avenue No overall rating, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Cherry Blossom Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  4. G
    Thorpe Wood Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    St Margarets Care Home Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Peterborough