Rated Care Homes

Walford Lodge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 76 of 101

    rated care homes in Shropshire are rated Good, like this one.

Walford Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Shropshire

Rated Good in October 2019.

Walford Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Roseville House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Bowens Field Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Highbury House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    The Orchard Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Landona House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Shropshire

See all care homes in Wem

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 8 October 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Walford Lodge is a residential care home providing personal care to six people with learning disabilities under the age of 65. The service can support up to a maximum of six people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The home is split over two levels with bedrooms situated on both the ground and first floor. People have access to ensuite toilets and shared communal bathrooms. People were able to move around the home freely and have access to outside space. The home is located close to local amenities and has accessible transport to support people to attend college placements and activities outside of the local area.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

What inspectors found

The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people. The service used some restrictive intervention practices as a last resort, in a person-centred way, in line with positive behaviour support principles.

People were safeguarded from harm by staff who had received the relevant training. Risks to people's safety were assessed and clear guidance was in place to explain to staff how to mitigate any known risk. People were supported by staff who had been recruited following safe recruitment procedures. People received their medicine on time and were protected from the risk of infection. Accident and incident forms were completed, and lessons were learnt when things went wrong.

People's care needs were assessed, and staff received training that enabled them to meet people's needs. People were supported to maintain a balanced diet and had access to fluids and snacks. Systems were in place to ensure information was shared when necessary. For example, when accessing health care. The building was adapted to meet people's needs and people had access to outside space.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

People were treated with kindness and supported to express their opinion wherever possible. People's dignity was protected, and people were encouraged to maintain develop their independence.

People's care was personalised to their individual needs and people had access to activities they were known to enjoy. Staff used alternative means of communication such as photographs to assist people in the exchange of information. People were supported to maintain relationships and attend family events. A complaints procedure was in place. No one was in receipt of end of life care however advance decisions were in place for some people.

People were supported by a staff team who worked well together and felt supported. Staff were open and honest when something went wrong. Regular audits were in place and monitored to ensure people received a good service. Staff attended regular team meetings and updated families of up and coming events via a newsletter. Staff were supported to maintain up to date knowledge and the provider worked in partnership with other agencies.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Donna Shrimpton
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 8 October 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP29768R (opens Companies House)

Condover College Limited runs 14 services, all in the West Midlands. 12 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Condover College Limited

  1. O
    Church View Outstanding. Care home, Shropshire
  2. O
    Welwyn Outstanding. Care home, Shropshire
  3. G
    38 Torrin Drive Good. Care home, Shropshire
  4. G
    Greenfields Good. Care home, Shropshire

See all 14 services run by Condover College Limited

Getting help from Shropshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Walford Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Walford Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Walford Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Walford Lodge.
When was Walford Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Walford Lodge was published on 8 October 2019.
Who runs Walford Lodge?
Walford Lodge is run by Condover College Limited. It runs 14 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Walford Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 October 2019.

Contact

Phone
01939 260992
Address
7 Mill Street, Wem, Shrewsbury, SY4 5ED Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Roseville House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Bowens Field Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Highbury House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    The Orchard Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Landona House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Shropshire

See all care homes in Wem