Rated Care Homes

The Goddards

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2020.

  • 18 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 122

    rated care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

The Goddards: inspection record

Care home, 14 beds, East Riding of Yorkshire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2025.

The Goddards: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wesley Place (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Snaith Hall Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Wesley Place Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Snaith Hall Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Field View Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away
  4. G
    Parklands Care Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire

See all care homes in West Cowick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 April 2025 (assessment visit 7 October 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 10 October 2024 to 2 February 2025, including site visits on 10 and 15 October 2025, 15 January and 7 February 2025. This assessment was carried out in response to information we had received about the service. We reviewed 22 quality statements under the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led. An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. The Goddards - Care Home Learning Disabilities is a care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 14 people with learning disabilities and/or autistic people. During this latest assessment we identified areas for improvement of the quality of care provided to people. People were not always protected from abuse. Staff were able to identify, and report concerns about people's welfare. However, the management team did not always follow internal and external policies to protect people from harm. People were given their medicines safely and in a timely manner. We found the management team open and honest, and they had identified some concerns relating to staffing at the service. However, governance systems in place to manage the quality of the service were not always effective and did not support with improving the service. The registered manager was aware of some of the governance issues at the service and whilst they understood their role, they prioritised people's needs and the delivery of care. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We identified a breach of regulation in relation to governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed or potential harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality care and continual improvement of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 April 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 April 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jayne Womersley
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 15 January 2020. Latest assessment published 3 April 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11267062 (opens Companies House)

Goddards Care Limited runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Goddards Care Limited

  1. RI
    The Goddards Home From Home Care Requires improvement. Home care, East Riding of Yorkshire

Getting help from East Riding of Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Goddards provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Goddards as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Goddards have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 14 beds at The Goddards.
When was The Goddards last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Goddards was published on 3 April 2025.
Who runs The Goddards?
The Goddards is run by Goddards Care Limited. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is The Goddards's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 April 2025.

Contact

Phone
01405 860247
Address
Goole Road, West Cowick, Goole, DN14 9DJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wesley Place (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Snaith Hall Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Wesley Place Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Snaith Hall Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Field View Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away
  4. G
    Parklands Care Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in East Riding of Yorkshire

See all care homes in West Cowick