Rated Care Homes

Rother Valley View

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 59 of 72

    rated care homes in Rotherham are rated Good, like this one.

Rother Valley View: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Rotherham

Rated Good in September 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Rother Valley View: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hartleys Care Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Swallownest Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Knowle Hill Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Kingdom House Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Rotherham

See all care homes in Swallownest

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 September 2025 (assessment visit 5 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 7 August to 18 August 2025.

Rother Valley View is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 6 people. They are registered to provide support to people with a range of different needs including people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. At the time of the assessment, there were 6 people living at Rother Valley View.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was to follow up on actions from the last inspection in October 2022.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. This provider was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

Since the last inspection the home has had a change of provider and also a new manager.

People were protected from the risks of abuse and staff were trusted to keep them safe. Staff had received training in how to safeguard people.

We found the service had a good learning culture and people felt able to raise concerns. Incidents that had occurred at the service had been investigated and lessons learned had been completed to mitigate future risk. Data and information systems were used effectively to analyse information, identify themes and trends and improve the care and support provided.

Care records overall were person centred and were seen to be reviewed regularly. However, some recent information needed to be added for one person which was actioned by the manager. People's care needs were risk assessed and care plans provided staff with the information they needed to manage the identified risk. The service worked well with other health and social care professionals and supported people to achieve good outcomes.

Risk overall was well managed. We identified a few areas for improvement which were addressed immediately.

Staff treated people as individuals offering choice and supporting independence. Peoples protected characteristics were considered and staff understood individual preferences and listened to people.

Medicines were administered safely and learning from audits applied. We advised some improvements around the administration of creams and handwritten records which were actioned immediately.

Recruitment checks were robust to ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. Staff had the necessary safety checks in place before starting work and completed a full induction.

The provider, manager and staff had a shared culture and passion for ensuring people reached their maximum potential. The provider and manager were visible and accessible for staff to seek advice and guidance.

Governance systems were in place to monitor the standard of care people received.

Staff told us the provider and manager were fair, had an ‘open door’ policy and they created a positive working culture to drive continual learning and improvement.

At the last inspection the previous provider was rated requires improvement. At this assessment under the new provider, we reviewed all 5 key questions, and the overall rating is now good.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment under the old provider, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment under the new provider the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment under the old provider, we rated this key question good. At this assessment under the new provider the rating has remained good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment under the old provider, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment under the new provider the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment under the old provider, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment under the new provider the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment under the old provider, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment under the new provider the rating has changed to good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Katie-Leigh Camm
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 15 November 2022. Latest assessment published 11 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Cristal Care LimitedBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05714286 (opens Companies House)

Cristal Care Limited runs 5 services in England, 4 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Cristal Care Limited

  1. G
    Langold View Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  2. G
    The Pleasance Good. Care home, Doncaster
  3. G
    The Terrace Good. Care home, Doncaster
  4. RI
    Gateway House Requires improvement. Care home, Rotherham

Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rother Valley View provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rother Valley View as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rother Valley View have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Rother Valley View.
When was Rother Valley View last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rother Valley View was published on 11 September 2025.
Who runs Rother Valley View?
Rother Valley View is run by Cristal Care Limited. It runs 5 services in England, 4 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Rother Valley View's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 September 2025.

Contact

Address
44 Worksop Road, Swallownest, Sheffield, S26 4WD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hartleys Care Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Swallownest Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Knowle Hill Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Kingdom House Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Rotherham

See all care homes in Swallownest