Rated Care Homes

Graysford Hall

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2021.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 71 of 90

    rated care homes in Leicester are rated Good, like this one.

Graysford Hall: inspection record

Care home, 72 beds, Leicester

Rated Good in July 2025.

Graysford Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Clarendon Beechlands Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Stoneygate Oaklands Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Pendene House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Toller Road Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Leicester

See all care homes in Central Leicester

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 July 2025 (assessment visit 23 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 13 May to 28 May 2025. We visited the service unannounced on 13 May 2025 and announced on 14 May 2025.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The staff at Graysford Hall were exceptionally caring and kind. People felt valued and respected by staff who knew them well. Staff empowered people to make choices about their care and support and to maintain their independence. Staff had excellent relationships with the people they supported and wanted them to have the best quality of life possible. Feedback from people and relatives, and observations we made, provided many examples of staff going out of their way to provide prompt, compassionate and respectful care.

People were safe at the service. There were enough staff on duty to meet people’s needs. Staff had the knowledge and training they needed to support people safely. Staff knew how to minimise risk to people and prevent accidents and incidents. The premises were clean and well-maintained.

Staff worked closely and effectively with healthcare professionals to ensure people’s medical needs were met. People’s healthcare needs were monitored, and they had appointments with healthcare professionals including GPs, district nurses, speech and language therapists (SALT), dentists, opticians, and physiotherapists.

People and relatives were involved in planning and making shared decisions about people’s care and support. People had detailed care plans which staff followed to ensure people’s needs were met in the way they wanted. Staff understood people’s communication needs and shared information with them in accessible formats, for example, pictorial, in large print, and verbally.

The service had a positive, open, and welcoming culture which centred on the well-being of the people living there. Managers completed regular audits to ensure the service was running safely and effectively. Staff and managers ensured that people and relatives were involved in changes and improvements to the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lorraine Welham
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 5 January 2023. Latest assessment published 22 July 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Sanders Senior Living LimitedBrand: Runwood
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10974066 (opens Companies House)

Sanders Senior Living Limited runs 11 services in England, 3 of them in the East Midlands. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 4 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Sanders Senior Living Limited

  1. G
    Chelmunds Court Good. Care home with nursing, Solihull, West Midlands
  2. G
    Claridge Place Good. Care home, Solihull, West Midlands
  3. G
    Eve Belle Good. Care home, Essex, East of England
  4. G
    Rose House Good. Care home, Doncaster, Yorkshire and the Humber

See all 11 services run by Sanders Senior Living Limited

Getting help from Leicester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Graysford Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Graysford Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Graysford Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 72 beds at Graysford Hall.
When was Graysford Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Graysford Hall was published on 22 July 2025.
Who runs Graysford Hall?
Graysford Hall is run by Sanders Senior Living Limited. It runs 11 services in England, 3 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Graysford Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 July 2025.