Pennine Care Centre
- Care home
- 64 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2020
- Derbyshire, East Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
9 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
2 years
since the latest rating was published.
41 of 219
rated care homes in Derbyshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Pennine Care Centre: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in October 2024, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Risings Residential Home for the Elderly (Outstanding, 0.4 miles away) and Willowbank (Outstanding, 2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Redcourt Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- O The Risings Residential Home for the Elderly Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
- RI Pendlebury Court Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- RI Hope Valley Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- RI Regency Hall Requires improvement, 2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 October 2024 (assessment visit 24 July 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 1 August to 12 September 2024. We found 3 breaches of the legal regulations relating to safe care, dignity and governance.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We found some improvements were required for the management of safety incidents, safeguarding and care plans and risk assessments. Meals were not always in line with the provider’s expectations of quality, and we found some areas of the home were not clean and some kitchen processes not followed. Records were not always accurate, and audits and checks were not always effective at identifying areas for improvement. People had not always had their rights to privacy and dignity respected. Governance systems and audits had not yet shown sustained improvements in the quality and safety of people’s care. Not all relevant events had been notified to the Care Quality Commission.
However, people were involved in their care and supported to work towards achieving their aims and their independence was promoted. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and medicines practices were in line with good practice guidelines.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
This inspection was in response to receiving a number of whistleblowing and safeguarding concerns. Some safeguarding investigations were in progress, and other new incidents identified at the time of our assessment. In addition, one specific incident, previously notified to the Care Quality Commission, whereby a person alleged they were harmed whilst staff assisted them to transfer was subject to a criminal investigation at the time of writing this report. As a result, this inspection did not examine the circumstances of the incident. However, the information CQC received about the incident indicated possible concerns about the management of moving and handling risks. This inspection examined those risks.
-
Safe
No rating
Our rating for this key question has now changed to requires improvement.
We identified 1 breach of the legal regulations.
Processes to ensure a learning culture had not yet been fully embedded. People had not always been protected from potential abuse and injury and not all safety incidents had been referred to the local authority safeguarding team. Some areas of the home were not cleaned effectively and not all steps to ensure good infection prevention and control had been taken. However, people’s needs were assessed, and they were helped to achieve their goals and aims. Processes were in place to help manage medicines in line with good practice. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Plan to refurbish the environment were underway.
-
Effective
Good
Our rating for this key question has remained good.
People were involved in their care planning and supported towards their goals and aims. People had not always been given meals in line with the provider’s own expectations of quality. Risk assessments did not always reflect risks to people and how to reduce those.
-
Caring
No rating
Our rating for this key question has changed to requires improvement.
We found 1 breach of the legal requirements.
During our assessment a serious incident occurred that involved a significant breach of a person’s privacy and dignity. Partners and staff had mixed views as to whether the people were always supported with respect.
However, people told us they liked the staff that worked at the service, their independence was supported, and their needs met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Our rating for this key question has changed to requires improvement.
We found 1 breach of the legal requirements.
The provider was working towards improvements however, these had not yet been fully embedded, and improvements had not yet been sustained. Not all staff felt involved in the changes or felt the leadership team were approachable; as such, not all staff felt confident speaking up if things were not right. Improvements were required to leaders’ oversight of the service to ensure improvements could be identified and embedded. Systems to provide oversight and ensure compliance were not always effective, for example, notifications were not always submitted to CQC when required and records were not always accurate.
Steps to help people make links to their local community were in place and people had access to health care services as needed.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 30 October 2024. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 30 October 2024. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 30 October 2024. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Parimala Varsha
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 22 September 2023. Latest assessment published 30 October 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- NYMS Services Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 11745075 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Derbyshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Derbyshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01629 533190, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Derbyshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Pennine Care Centre provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Pennine Care Centre as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Pennine Care Centre have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 64 beds at Pennine Care Centre.
- When was Pennine Care Centre last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pennine Care Centre was published on 30 October 2024.
- Who runs Pennine Care Centre?
- Pennine Care Centre is run by NYMS Services Ltd.
- What is Pennine Care Centre's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 30 October 2024.
Contact
- Phone
- 01457 862466
- Address
- Hobroyd, Glossop, SK13 6JW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Risings Residential Home for the Elderly (Outstanding, 0.4 miles away) and Willowbank (Outstanding, 2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Redcourt Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- O The Risings Residential Home for the Elderly Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
- RI Pendlebury Court Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- RI Hope Valley Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- RI Regency Hall Requires improvement, 2 miles away