Rated Care Homes

Thomas Knight Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 23 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 89

    rated care homes in Northumberland are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Thomas Knight Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 54 beds, Northumberland

Rated Requires improvement in November 2024, down from Good.

Thomas Knight Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Percy House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and Ridley Park (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Percy House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Ridley Park Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Waterloo House Rest Home Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Crofton Court Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    The Oaks Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Northumberland

See all care homes in Blyth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 November 2024 (assessment visit 12 July 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out our on-site assessment on 13 August 2024, off-site assessment activity started on 13 August 2024 and ended on 11 September 2024. We looked at evidence categories in Safe and Well-Led. There were areas of improvement for the service to focus on, most notably governance and oversight. The provider and registered manager had not always ensured there were effective governance in place to ensure safe and effective care at all times. We therefore found the service was therefore in breach of regulation 17 (good governance). Documented analysis of incidents had only started in the previous month, at the request of other stakeholders, and there was a lack of formal auditing documentation to identify issues and demonstrate improvements. Concerns regarding the environment, staff being bare below elbow, safeguarding responses, and medicines record keeping, could reasonably have been addressed prior to our visit, with effective governance processes in place. Feedback was mixed about the responsiveness of leadership and the availability of staff. The provider was open to feedback and they shared their policies and staffing arrangements promptly. There were positives, such as people’s descriptions of staff and how they engaged with people and their relatives. People felt safe and secure, and had access to a range of primary and secondary healthcare services when they needed. Improvements had been made to medicines record keeping, following support from other stakeholders. Safeguarding training, policies and procedures and policies were up to date. People and their relatives were involved in care planning and review. The culture was focused on people receiving safe care, but needed to be open to other ways of working, and explore best practice to continue improving. They had yet to demonstrate improvements were sustainable.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    People were not always kept safe and protected as they should be through thorough and prompt actions. The provider had not always learned from incidents and did not have effective monitoring and auditing processes in place to ensure that risks did not recur.

    People were respected and their freedoms protected in line with legislation. When people raised concerns about safety and ideas to improve, they felt they were listened to and the registered manager, and other staff, took action. On a day to day basis, staff protected people from the risks they faced and for the most part demonstrated a good knowledge of those risks.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    The provider had not always ensured lessons learned were shared and acted on effectively, and governance arrangements were not always effective.

    The provider and registered manager had not always ensured there were effective governance in place to ensure safe and effective care at all times. We therefore found the service was therefore in breach of regulation 17 (good governance).

    The provider was able to demonstrate some recent improvements, for instance beginning analysis of falls, incidents and people’s weights, but this had only happened after prompting by external stakeholders. The provider had yet to demonstrate they could effectively audit and scrutinize their own service to maintain and improve standards.

    Feedback was mixed about the responsiveness of leadership and the availability of staff. The provider was open to feedback and they shared their policies and staffing arrangements promptly.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 5 November 2024. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 November 2024. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Courtney Oliver
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 2 July 2022. Latest assessment published 5 November 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07187204 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Northumberland County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Thomas Knight Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Thomas Knight Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Thomas Knight Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 54 beds at Thomas Knight Care Home.
When was Thomas Knight Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Thomas Knight Care Home was published on 5 November 2024.
Who runs Thomas Knight Care Home?
Thomas Knight Care Home is run by Thomas Knight Care Home Limited.
What is Thomas Knight Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 5 November 2024.

Contact

Phone
01670 546576
Address
Beaconsfield Street, Blyth, NE24 2DP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Percy House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and Ridley Park (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. O
    Percy House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Ridley Park Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Waterloo House Rest Home Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Crofton Court Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    The Oaks Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Northumberland

See all care homes in Blyth