The Oaks Care Home
- Care home
- 45 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2017
- Blyth, Northumberland, North East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2018, most recently Requires improvement in November 2025.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
8 of 89
rated care homes in Northumberland are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
The Oaks Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: South Quay Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Crofton Court (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G South Quay Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Crofton Court Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Waterloo House Rest Home Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Thomas Knight Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- O Percy House Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 November 2025 (assessment visit 5 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 10 and 26 September 2025.
The Oaks Care Home provides residential and nursing care for up to 45 people. At the time of this assessment there were 31 people living in the home, some of whom were living with a dementia.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We carried out this assessment because we received concerns from the local authority, integrated care board (ICB) and local NHS infection control team about people’s care and support, the environment, infection control and the management of the home.
At our previous 2 inspections, the provider had been in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. At this assessment, not enough action had been taken to improve and the provider remained in breach of these regulations. We also found an additional breach of the regulations relating to person-centred care.
There had been no registered manager in post since July 2024. An interim manager was in place at the time of our assessment. Staff, people and relatives spoke positively about them. A new manager had been recruited and was due to start following our assessment.
Risks relating to people’s care and support were not always effectively assessed, recorded, monitored and managed. Information regarding people’s nutrition and hydration, falls management, catheter care and positional changes to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers was not always accurate or detailed.
Records did not always evidence that an effective system was in place to ensure medicines were safely administered, stored and managed.
Action was being taken following the ICB, local authority and the local NHS infection control practitioners' visits in relation to the cleanliness of the home. When we visited, the home was cleaner, however, areas of wood and paint work were not intact which made it difficult to keep clean. Certain areas of the home, including several people’s bedrooms were malodourous. New non-slip flooring was going to be fitted in many of the carpeted rooms.
Prior to our assessment, training, supervision and appraisal meetings had not been carried out as planned. Training was being organised and carried out and a new supervision and appraisal planner had been implemented.
The home was in organisational safeguarding. This meant the local authority was monitoring the home and supporting them to ensure the correct procedures were in place to keep people safe. The provider put a voluntary suspension on admissions to the home to allow improvements to be made ensure people’s safety.
The provider had formulated an action plan prior to our assessment and updated it during and following our site visits and those visits carried out by the local authority and ICB, to ensure improvements were made.
A system to ensure regulatory requirements were met was still not in place. This was the third consecutive inspection the provider has been in breach of the regulations. There were shortfalls across the service in relation to medicines management, the environment, staff support and training, meeting people’s social needs, nutrition and hydration, the assessment of risk and record keeping.
We will request an action plan and meet with the provider following this report being published to discuss how they will make changes to ensure they improve their rating to at least good.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and governance.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance and person-centred care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The service was in breach of the legal regulations in relation to governance and person-centred care.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 20 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 20 November 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 20 November 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 20 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Cheryl Goff
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)5 inspection reports, latest 24 August 2023. Latest assessment published 20 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Hill Care 3 LimitedBrand: Hill Care Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07602678 (opens Companies House)
Hill Care 3 Limited runs 5 services in England, 4 of them in the North East. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Hill Care 3 Limited
- O Deangate Care Home Outstanding. Care home, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
- G Bannatyne Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, County Durham
- G Pelton Grange Care Home Good. Care home, County Durham
- G Waverley Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Newcastle upon Tyne
Getting help from Northumberland County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Northumberland County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01670 536 400
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Northumberland County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Oaks Care Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists The Oaks Care Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does The Oaks Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 45 beds at The Oaks Care Home.
- When was The Oaks Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Oaks Care Home was published on 20 November 2025.
- Who runs The Oaks Care Home?
- The Oaks Care Home is run by Hill Care 3 Limited. It runs 5 services in England, 4 of them in the North East.
- What is The Oaks Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 20 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01670 354181
- Address
- Durban Road, Blyth, NE24 1PN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: South Quay Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Crofton Court (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G South Quay Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Crofton Court Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Waterloo House Rest Home Limited Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Thomas Knight Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- O Percy House Outstanding, 0.7 miles away