The Grove
- Care home
- 5 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2020
- Marton, Middlesbrough, North East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
5 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
37 of 41
rated care homes in Middlesbrough are rated Good, like this one.
The Grove: inspection record
Rated Good in June 2021.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Delamere Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- G Ransdale House Good, 0.9 miles away
- – Woodside Resource Centre Not yet rated, 1 mile away
- G Tollesby Hall Nursing Home Good, 1 mile away
- G Spring Gardens Good, 1 mile away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 4 June 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The Grove is a residential care home providing personal care for up to five people aged 18 years and over who are living with learning disabilities and/or autism. At the time of the inspection three people were living at the home with another person planning to move in.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The Grove is a large, adapted house situated in a residential area, close to transport links, shops and open spaces. It has its own private enclosed gardens which all people can use if they require quiet time or a safe space.
What inspectors found
People were observed to be happy and supported by a knowledgeable staff team who knew them well and who were recruited safely. The service provided flexible care and support in line with people's needs, wishes and choices.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Some accidents and incidents were analysed to learn lessons and improve outcomes for people. We found some behavioural incident records lacked detail. There was an inconsistent approach to the management of debrief sessions with staff to support their reflection and learning from incidents. We have made a recommendation about this.
The provider and registered manager monitored quality, acted quickly when change was needed, sought people's views, and planned ongoing improvements to the services. Audits of incident records had not found the inconsistent approach to how staff recorded and reflected on their practices when managing behaviours that were challenging. We have made a recommendation about this.
Medicines were managed safely. Enough staff were working at the home to ensure people received safe and effective levels of care. Risks to people's health were identified and managed safely by a staff team who understood their responsibilities to protect people from discrimination, abuse, and avoidable harm. Staff felt well supported by the management team and received effective training, competency assessments, supervision and appraisal.
People were treated with dignity and respect. Staff knew people's interests and preferences. People were supported to have a voice, be independent and take positive risks. People were supported to access a wide range of community activities of their choice, which enriched the quality of their lives. People were supported to have regular health check-ups and maintain relationships with people close to them.
Staff, in line with current national guidance for COVID-19 and the provider's infection control policy, maintained high standards of cleanliness and hygiene in the home.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff them in the least
restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The service used some restrictive intervention practices as a last resort, these were used in line with people's individual positive behaviour support plans and staff training.
We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right Support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people.
This service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of right support, right care, right culture. The model of care and support provided to people living at the home maximised their choice, control and independence. People were involved in all aspects of their care and future planning. Care provided at the home was centred around the person and promoted people's dignity, privacy and human rights. People moving into the home had their own individually tailored, person centred transition plan. The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management team and support staff ensured people lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Anthony Risker
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 4 June 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Swanton Care & Community LimitedBrand: Swanton Care and Community
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05789785 (opens Companies House)
Swanton Care & Community Limited runs 14 services in England, 2 of them in the North East. 11 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Swanton Care & Community Limited
- G Baylis Place Good. Care home, Hull, Yorkshire and the Humber
- G Darwin Place Good. Care home, Shropshire, West Midlands
- G Eden View Good. Care home with nursing, Cambridgeshire, East of England
- G Gryphon Place Good. Care home with nursing, Norfolk, East of England
Getting help from Middlesbrough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Middlesbrough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01642 065070, Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm (press 1, then 1 again)
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Middlesbrough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Grove provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Grove as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does The Grove have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at The Grove.
- When was The Grove last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Grove was published on 4 June 2021.
- Who runs The Grove?
- The Grove is run by Swanton Care & Community Limited. It runs 14 services in England, 2 of them in the North East.
- What is The Grove's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 June 2021.
Contact
- Phone
- 01642 931480
- Address
- 97b, The Grove, Marton-in-cleveland, Middlesbrough, TS7 8AN Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Delamere Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- G Ransdale House Good, 0.9 miles away
- – Woodside Resource Centre Not yet rated, 1 mile away
- G Tollesby Hall Nursing Home Good, 1 mile away
- G Spring Gardens Good, 1 mile away