Rated Care Homes

Noblesse Care Ltd

Home care, Merton

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Noblesse Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Merton

Rated Good in January 2025.

Noblesse Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Rated Good in January 2025.

The latest rating was published 21 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 43 Good home care services in Merton, out of 43 with a rating.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 January 2025 (assessment visit 11 November 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Noblesse Care Ltd is a domiciliary care agency registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide personal care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of this assessment 5 people were receiving a home care service from this provider. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

The team who conducted this assessment consisted of an inspector.

Read the full summary

This on-site inspection was announced, and we gave the provider 23 hours’ notice. This was because we needed to be sure the registered manager would be available to support this assessment.

We conducted our on-site assessment of this service on 13 November 2023.

We looked at all 5 key questions and 34 quality statements during this assessment. Based on the findings of this schemes inaugural CQC assessment we have rated them good overall.

Staff and managers understood their responsibilities in safeguarding people from abuse and protecting them from harm. Risks to people were assessed and the provider encouraged positive risk taking, where people were able to live independent lives safe from harm. Staff followed current best practice guidelines regarding the prevention and control of infection. There were robust recruitment checks in place.

People’s healthcare needs were met, and they received access to support as required.

Staff treated people as individuals and with respect. They supported people to be as independent as possible and upheld their human rights. People were supported to have choice and control and were able to make decisions about how their care and support was provided.

Care plans were person centred and individual to people’s needs. People received equal access to services.

The provider operated good governance and oversight systems which were used to identify areas of improvement.

  1. Safe

    Good

    This was the first assessment of this registered service under a new provider, and we therefore assessed all 8 quality statements associated with this key question.

    Based on the findings of this assessment, our rating for this key question is good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    People were kept safe and were protected from avoidable harm, and care workers understood their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding procedures. The provider followed current guidance regarding infection prevention and control.

    There were robust pre-recruitment checks in place and staff received training that was relevant to their roles.

  2. Effective

    Good

    This was the first assessment of this registered service under a new provider and therefore we assessed all 6 quality statements from this key question.

    Based on the findings of this assessment, our rating for this key question is good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    This was the first assessment of this registered service under a new provider and therefore we assessed all 6 quality statements from this key question.

    Based on the findings of this assessment, our rating for this key question is good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

    People were supported to have choice and control and made decisions about how their support was provided. They were encouraged and supported by staff to do as much as they could for themselves to maintain their independence. People were supported to understand their rights and how the service would make sure these were respected.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    This was the first assessment of this registered service under a new provider and therefore we assessed all 7 quality statements from this key question.

    Based on the findings of this assessment, our rating for this key question is good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

    Staff knew about people’s preferences and wishes and treated everyone as an individual. Staff ensured they communicated and shared information with people in a way they could easily understand. Care plans gave a good overview of people's support needs. People were treated fairly and free from the fear of being discriminated against. People were supported to understand their equality and human rights and how staff and managers would respect these. Staff supported people to plan for their end of their life care.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    This was the first assessment of this registered service under a new provider and therefore we assessed all 7 quality statements from this key question.

    Based on the findings of this assessment, our rating for this key question is good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider had established oversight and security systems, which they operated effectively. The managers had the skills, knowledge and experience to lead effectively. The provider’s culture was positive, open, and honest. with leadership and management that was supportive and open to feedback.

Questions to ask the service

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  • Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Contact and registration details

Details for Noblesse Care Ltd
AddressUnit 1-3, Wyvern Estate, Beverley Way, New Malden, KT3 4PH
Registered managerEdena Maria Grosu Picu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • People with an eating disorder
  • Physical Disability
  • Sensory Impairment
  • Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Noblesse Care Ltd
ProviderNoblesse Care Ltd
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number13210586 (opens Companies House)

Nearest alternatives

  1. G Good
  2. G
    Onnuri Care Home care, 0.6 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    London Care (Raynes Park) Home care, 0.9 miles away
    Good
  4. –
    St Ann's Lodge 2 Care home, 1 mile away
    No overall rating
  5. G
    Aid With Care Limited Home care, 1.2 miles away
    Good

See all home care in Merton

Getting help from London Borough of Merton

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Noblesse Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Noblesse Care Ltd.
When was Noblesse Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Noblesse Care Ltd was published on 14 January 2025.
Who runs Noblesse Care Ltd?
Noblesse Care Ltd is run by Noblesse Care Ltd.
What is Noblesse Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 January 2025.