Supreme Care Services Limited

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 January 2025 (assessment visit 19 June 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

1. Safe

   GGood Good

   Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

   People received a safe service, were protected from abuse or neglect and had their human rights promoted. Staff and managers understood the reporting procedure for any safeguarding concern or allegation. Risks to people were assessed and their safety was monitored and managed, with minimal restrictions on their freedom. Accidents and incidents were monitored and analysed, so lessons could be learned and recurrences could be avoided. The service followed robust recruitment procedures and there were enough suitably trained staff employed to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. Staff supported people to manage their medicines safely where required. Regular medicines audits were completed, staff were trained and their competency was checked at regular intervals.

2. Effective

   GGood Good

   Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

   People had their needs assessed and their choices listened to. People’s needs assessments formed the basis of their care plans and these were accurate and up to date. People’s care needs were regularly reviewed and any changes or updates that were required were made accordingly.

3. Caring

   GGood Good

   Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

   People were involved in planning the care and support they received. Staff encouraged people to maintain their independence and people were supported to make their own choices and decisions. People had control over their lives, including their care and support. The service supported people to understand their rights by using different languages and individual communication techniques.

4. Responsive

   GGood Good

   Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

   People received a personalised service and were able to access any external resources they needed without barriers or delays. People were supported to live their lives as they chose, without discrimination. People knew how to make a complaint if needed. Complaints were listened to and responded to appropriately. Information from complaints, comments or concerns was used to help drive improvement.

5. Well-led

   GGood Good

   Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

   The service had made improvements. Staff and leaders ensured records regarding people’s care and the management of the service were accurate and up to date. The staff and management worked well with external professionals. Staff felt confident to speak up and were positive about the support they received from the whole management team. There was an open and inclusive workforce, which promoted people and staffs’ equity of experience and celebrated diversity. The provider had an effective process for evidencing lessons learnt. There were effective quality assurance processes and systems were in place to monitor and audit the quality of the service.