Rated Care Homes

Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Requires improvement at every inspection since 2023.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 15 of 114

    rated home care services in Gloucestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford: inspection record

Home care, Gloucestershire

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026.

Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Caremark (Herefordshire and Forest of Dean) (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Crossroads Care - Forest of Dean and Herefordshire (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Caremark (Herefordshire and Forest of Dean) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    TNC Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Severn Dean Support Good, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Forest Home Care Support Limited Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Cinderford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 May 2026 (assessment visit 20 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 19 to 25 February 2026. Bramble Homecare LTD - Cinderford is a homecare agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. At the time of our inspection there were 54 people using the service. At our last assessment, the rating was requires improvement. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance. At this assessment, improvements were found, the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation, however the rating has remained requires improvement.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service is registered to support older people and younger adults with dementia, eating disorders, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. Not everyone using the service received a regulated activity (personal care). CQC only inspects for those people receiving personal care.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not providing a regulated activity to any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The service had a proactive and positive culture of safety. They investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice.

There were robust and safe recruitment practices in place to make sure all staff, were suitably experienced, competent, and able to carry out their role.

People knew how to give feedback, and staff told us they felt supported and encouraged to speak up. The provider fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them.

At the time of our assessment there was not a registered manager in place. The manager had recently been recruited.

Staff did not always assess risks to people's health and safety or mitigate them where identified.

Whilst the service ensured staff received training appropriate to their role, they needed to further train and develop their staff in dignity and person-centred care.

The service did not always ensure medicines were managed safely.

People did not always have robust care plans to guide safe practice.

Governance systems and audits were in place but had recently been implemented and therefore had not been effective in identifying or addressing all areas for improvement.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    his meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance. The provider was no longer in breach of this regulation. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement.

    This meant the service management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 11 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 11 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 3 June 2023. Latest assessment published 11 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07403917 (opens Companies House)

Bramble Homecare Limited runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Bramble Homecare Limited

  1. G
    Bramble Home Care Limited Good. Home care, Gloucestershire

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford.
When was Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford was published on 11 May 2026.
Who runs Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford?
Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford is run by Bramble Homecare Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
What is Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 11 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01684 217040
Address
6, High Street, Cinderford, GL14 2SH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Caremark (Herefordshire and Forest of Dean) (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Crossroads Care - Forest of Dean and Herefordshire (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Caremark (Herefordshire and Forest of Dean) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    TNC Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Severn Dean Support Good, 1 mile away
  5. –
    Forest Home Care Support Limited Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Cinderford