Bramble Home Care Limited
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2014
- Bamfurlong, Gloucestershire, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
90 of 114
rated home care services in Gloucestershire are rated Good, like this one.
Bramble Home Care Limited: inspection record
Rated Good in April 2026, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Alina Homecare Cheltenham & Cotswolds Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Caremark Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Benhall Care Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- G Care at Home Good, 1.6 miles away
- G Richmond Village Cheltenham DCA Good, 1.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 April 2026 (assessment visit 8 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 11 February to 12 February 2026. Bramble Home Care Limited is a homecare service providing personal care to adults of all ages in their homes. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care’; such as help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our assessment, 55 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The assessment took place to follow up on previous breaches in regulation. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. During this inspection, the provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment. This was a breach of regulation 12 safe care and treatment.
The service had met their action plan for their previous breaches of regulations; however, at this assessment new breaches of regulations were found in relation to medicines management.
We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
We rated this service as good overall.
The service had a strong, proactive and positive culture, which empowered people to reduce risks to their safety. The service had an open and transparent culture and staff had a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement. Challenges were seen as opportunities and not obstacles, which showed a true commitment to support people to maintain their health and wellbeing. Staff were trained and supported in their roles. All staff spoke highly about the providers values of genuinely caring and valuing them as a team which ensured they delivered high-quality care to people.
People’s care was planned in an exceptionally personalised and holistic way. Leaders and staff worked diligently to ensure people’s emotional wellbeing and health needs were met. The provider strived to ensure people had the same staff members to support them and sought feedback in a personalised system created by the managers. They welcomed contact from people and their relatives and wanted to ensure everyone who contacted the service had a positive outcome.
Staff and leaders were exceptional at treating people with kindness, empathy, and compassion. They respected people’s dignity and privacy and understood the importance of supporting people to maintain their independence. The provider not only valued people using their service, but their individual support networks too.
There was a very strong emphasis on the provision of reducing social isolation which was meaningful to people.
Staff excelled in identifying when people needed additional support from other agencies and supported them to access these without delay. When a need was identified, the provider quickly developed training to enable staff to meet people’s needs and to deliver safe care. Staff demonstrated exceptional values of putting people first and advocating on their behalf to ensure they did not experience any barriers to care. Professionals spoke highly of staff’s proactive and compassionate approach.
However, the service was not managing medicines safely. We found concerns regarding how the service’s systems recorded when medicines were omitted or when there was no stock. We also had concerns for administration of time sensitive medicines, risk assessments and information corroborated in care records. We found the service’s audits were not providing adequate oversight and areas of concern were not identified or followed up.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment as improvements were needed to the safe management of people’s medicine.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 15 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 14 September 2023. Latest assessment published 15 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Bramble Homecare Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07403917 (opens Companies House)
Bramble Homecare Limited runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Bramble Homecare Limited
- RI Bramble Home Care LTD - Cinderford Requires improvement. Home care, Gloucestershire
Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Gloucestershire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01452 426 868, Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Gloucestershire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Bramble Home Care Limited provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bramble Home Care Limited.
- When was Bramble Home Care Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bramble Home Care Limited was published on 15 April 2026.
- Who runs Bramble Home Care Limited?
- Bramble Home Care Limited is run by Bramble Homecare Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
- What is Bramble Home Care Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 April 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01684 217040
- Address
- Unit E, 4 Bamfurlong Industrial Park, Staverton, Cheltenham, GL51 6SX Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Alina Homecare Cheltenham & Cotswolds Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Caremark Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Benhall Care Requires improvement, 1.6 miles away
- G Care at Home Good, 1.6 miles away
- G Richmond Village Cheltenham DCA Good, 1.6 miles away