Rated Care Homes

Social Return Case Management Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 39 of 45

    rated home care services in County Durham are rated Good, like this one.

Social Return Case Management Ltd: inspection record

Home care, County Durham

Rated Good in November 2025.

Social Return Case Management Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    ACS Healthcare Services Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Helping Hands Durham Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Almond Flex Care Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  4. O
    Home Instead Durham Outstanding, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    Second to None Care Ltd Good, 2.1 miles away

See all home care services in County Durham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 November 2025 (assessment visit 11 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 15 October to 10 November 2025.

The service is a care at home service registered to provide support to children, younger adults and older people.

The service provides case management and assessment to people to help them achieve their goals. People have complex conditions resulting from brain acquired injury, spinal cord injury, stroke, cerebral palsy and multiple traumas.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Care Quality Commission regulates the personal care and support that people may receive. At the time of inspection there were 2 people using the service and receiving the regulated activity personal care. The inspection took place remotely.

This was the first rated inspection of the service. A registered manager was in place. A registered manager is registered with the Commission and is legally responsible to ensure that the service is compliant with legal and regulatory requirements.

Care was centred and tailored to each individual. Risk assessments were in place, and they identified current risks to the person as well as ways for staff to minimise or appropriately manage those risks, including for positive risk taking.

The service was flexible and adapted to people's changing needs and desires, enabling positive outcomes for people. People were encouraged and supported to lead as fulfilled a life as possible. They were supported to foster their dreams and aspirations. Records were personalised, up-to-date and reflected people's care and support needs. People’s mental capacity and ability to consent was taken into account. People and their representatives were involved in planning their care and support. There was clear evidence of collaborative working and excellent communication with other professionals to help meet people's needs.

There were enough staff with the necessary skills, qualifications and experience. Staff were safely recruited. People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. Staff received training to maintain high-quality care.Staffing capacity was sufficient and staff deployment was effective to ensure people's needs were met in a safe, timely and consistent way. Systems were in place for people to receive their medicines in a safe way.

People, relatives and staff were confident about approaching the registered manager if they needed to. They recognised their views and feedback were valued and respected and consistently used to support quality service development. Strong processes were in place to manage and respond to complaints and concerns. The registered manager and management team undertook a range of audits to check on the quality of care provided.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first inspection of this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first inspection of this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first inspection of this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first inspection for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service management and leadership were consistent. Leaders and the culture they created supported the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kate Purdy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09077571 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Durham County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Social Return Case Management Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Social Return Case Management Ltd.
When was Social Return Case Management Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Social Return Case Management Ltd was published on 18 November 2025.
Who runs Social Return Case Management Ltd?
Social Return Case Management Ltd is run by Social Return Case Management Limited.
What is Social Return Case Management Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 November 2025.

Contact

Address
Adelaide Court, Belmont Business Park, Durham, DH1 1TW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    ACS Healthcare Services Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Helping Hands Durham Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. –
    Almond Flex Care Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  4. O
    Home Instead Durham Outstanding, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    Second to None Care Ltd Good, 2.1 miles away

See all home care services in County Durham