Kensington Home Care
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2023
- Central Stockton-on-Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, North East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
2 years
since the latest rating was published.
26 of 27
rated home care services in Stockton-on-Tees are rated Good, like this one.
Kensington Home Care: inspection record
Rated Good in August 2024.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G CEL Homecare Teesside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G OneCall Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Care Matters (Homecare) Limited Stockton Good, 0.5 miles away
- – DURHAM VALLEY BUSINESS CENTRE Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 August 2024 (assessment visit 25 April 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out our on-site assessment on 9 May 2024, off site assessment activity started on 8 May 2024 and ended on 14 May 2024. We looked at 95 evidence categories within 34 quality statements. The service performed well against the majority of statements we looked at. There were areas for improvement in evidence categories linked to timeliness of care calls, cultural awareness of staff and future care planning.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Safeguarding procedures and policies were in place and implemented effectively. Risks were regularly reviewed following a detailed pre-assessment process and proactive work with other health and social care partners.
People and their relatives were involved in care planning. The provider has a ‘visiting officer’ role in place and this proved effective in understanding people’s needs from the outset. 6 monthly reviews were used to assess how people were finding the service and if any changes needed to be made. The visiting officer worked closely with the care co-ordinator and registered manager; the team had a strong understanding of people’s needs.
Staffing levels were sufficient to keep people safe, although there were times when staff arrived late for care calls, or did not stay the full time. Rotas were well planned and the registered manager was working to reduce the number of delayed calls, and to improve communication in this regard.
The majority of people who used the service described positive experiences, with carers being kind and respectful. Where particular concerns were raised about standard of food preparation. The registered manager acted on these.
The registered manager worked well with local partners. They had suitable experience in social care and led the service strongly. They acknowledged they could do more to explore links with other community organisations or educational establishments and were responsive to feedback.
-
Safe
Good
People were kept safe and protected from bullying, harassment, avoidable harm, neglect, abuse and discrimination. Their liberty was respected and protected in line with legislation. When people raised concerns about safety and ideas to improve, they were listened to and the registered manager took action. The registered manager had a strong awareness of the areas with the greatest safety risks. They ensured there were enough skilled people to meet people's basic needs. They recognised the potential risks to people caused by some late calls, the need to improve staff understanding of basic meal preparation and better communication with people.
-
Effective
Good
People experienced good health and wellbeing outcomes because their needs were assessed from the outset. Their care, support and treatment reflected these needs and had regard to any protected equality characteristics. The service work well with people, who were at the centre of their care package. The registered manager led an office team who wanted to continually improve the service and be mindful of best practice. Consent was factored in to care planning but people’s experience of their consent being sought was mixed.
-
Caring
Good
People were mostly treated with kindness, empathy and compassion. Their privacy and dignity was respected. Their preferences and choices were mostly respected, although they did experience some difficulties in staff being able to understand and communicate some basic information regarding their choices. People felt able to retain their independence.
-
Responsive
Good
Care planning put people's needs at the centre of how care was planned and delivered. Staff understood the health and care needs of people and responded well to involve external professionals when needed. People were supported to access care in ways that met their personal circumstances.
-
Well-led
Good
The registered manager and office team had developed a positive culture which embraced change and improvement. They understood people’s needs and were responsive to feedback and the need for improvements in certain areas. They had overcome a range of challenges since taking over the service and built strong links with external partners.
There were effective governance and management systems in place to monitor and reduce risk, and to find ways to improve the service.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Victoria Calvert Lockheart
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Kensington Home Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 14507223 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01642 527764
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Kensington Home Care provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Kensington Home Care.
- When was Kensington Home Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kensington Home Care was published on 6 August 2024.
- Who runs Kensington Home Care?
- Kensington Home Care is run by Kensington Home Care Limited.
- What is Kensington Home Care's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 August 2024.
Contact
- Phone
- 01642 057200
- Address
- Rooms 6-8, Gloucester House, 72 Church Road, Stockton-on-tees, TS18 1TW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G CEL Homecare Teesside Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G OneCall Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Care Matters (Homecare) Limited Stockton Good, 0.5 miles away
- – DURHAM VALLEY BUSINESS CENTRE Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away