Rated Care Homes

Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 26 of 27

    rated home care services in Stockton-on-Tees are rated Good, like this one.

Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool): inspection record

Home care, Stockton-on-Tees

Rated Good in June 2026.

Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Care Matters (Homecare) Limited Stockton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    DURHAM VALLEY BUSINESS CENTRE Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    North East Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Partners4Care Limited No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Advantage Healthcare - Tees Valley Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Stockton-on-Tees

See all home care services in Central Stockton-on-Tees

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 June 2026 (assessment visit 9 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out our assessment of this service between 17 April and 8 May 2026. The assessment was carried out because the service had been registered for over 12 months and had not yet been assessed and rated.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) provide care to people living in their own home. They are registered to provide care to people living with dementia, people with sensory impairment, physical disabilities, and mental health conditions.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is to help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the assessment there were 7 people receiving personal care.

The provider was committed to providing a non-discriminatory and inclusive approach within the service, both for people using the service and staff. They were committed to ensuring they met the needs and expectations of people, through a person-centred approach.

The provider had a robust assessment process, which involved people, and where appropriate their family members or advocates. Detailed and person-centred care plans were created to help guide staff when supporting people. Care plans included information on how to safely manage risk.

People’s needs were met by a consistent team of staff who had undergone a safe recruitment process. People were given choice wherever possible and consent was obtained when staff were providing support. Where people lacked capacity to make informed decisions, best interest decisions were made and documented.

People’s needs were regularly reviewed, and staff liaised with other professionals to promote people’s health and well-being.

Staff had the necessary training to support people’s individual needs and felt confident in asking for additional training if they felt it necessary. They received regular support through supervision, appraisals and meetings. Staff spoke very positively of the support they received from the provider.

The provider had robust governance and audit systems in place to ensure good oversight of the service. They had developed a positive culture of mutual respect between management, staff and people who used the service. They were committed to developing a high standard of care and were focusedon embedding good practice before growing the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hadia Malik
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14430532 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool).
When was Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) was published on 16 June 2026.
Who runs Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool)?
Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool) is run by HMW Care Limited.
What is Bluebird Care (Stockton and Hartlepool)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01642 918142
Address
Durham and Tees Valley Business Centre, Orde Wingate Way, Stockton-on-tees, TS19 0GA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Care Matters (Homecare) Limited Stockton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    DURHAM VALLEY BUSINESS CENTRE Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    North East Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Partners4Care Limited No overall rating, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Advantage Healthcare - Tees Valley Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Stockton-on-Tees

See all home care services in Central Stockton-on-Tees