Rated Care Homes

T Lives Healthcare Ltd

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • No rating

    No ratings have been published for this service yet.

  • 73%

    of rated home care services in Sandwell are Good or Outstanding (82% across the West Midlands, 88% across England).

T Lives Healthcare Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Sandwell

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

T Lives Healthcare Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cheshire Care Services Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Dimensions North Midlands Domiciliary Care Office (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    The Little Robins Care Services Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Arca Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Cheshire Care Services Ltd Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Dimensions Midlands Domiciliary Care Office Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Sandwell

See all home care services in Oldbury

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2026 (assessment visit 2 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 11 to 24 September 2026. We visited the service on 11 September 2026 and reviewed additional information and evidence remotely.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

T Lives Healthcare Ltd is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our assessment, the provider supported 2 people.

The provider did not always have effective systems to ensure people received safe, effective and consistently responsive care. Care plans, risk assessments and medicines records contained gaps, inaccuracies and contradictory information. Staff did not always have clear written guidance about how known health conditions and risks should be monitored, managed or escalated. Consent arrangements were not consistently evidenced, and contingency and emergency plans did not always explain how people’s support would continue safely when circumstances changed or regular staff were unavailable.

Governance and quality assurance systems had not identified or addressed these concerns before our assessment. This increased the risk staff would not have reliable information and that people could receive unsafe or inconsistent care. The service was in breach of regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance.

Despite these concerns, people and relatives were generally positive about their care. They described regular staff as caring, respectful and supportive. People felt safe, were treated with dignity and were supported to make choices, maintain their independence, and follow routines that were important to them. Staff understood safeguarding and escalation procedures and worked with relatives and health and social care professionals when people’s needs changed.

The provider responded to our feedback by introducing new audits, risk assessments, medicines reviews, contingency plans and service improvement processes. However, these changes were recent, and there was not yet sufficient evidence they were embedded or had resulted in sustained improvement.

At this assessment, we identified 2 breaches of legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service.

    This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment to rate this service.

    This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment to rate this service.

    This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and were involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment to rate this service.

    This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment to rate this service.

    This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant management and leadership were inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jeanette Bunga
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14709367 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does T Lives Healthcare Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for T Lives Healthcare Ltd.
When was T Lives Healthcare Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for T Lives Healthcare Ltd was published on 29 October 2026.
Who runs T Lives Healthcare Ltd?
T Lives Healthcare Ltd is run by T Lives Healthcare Ltd.
What is T Lives Healthcare Ltd's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
07557 124773
Address
156 City Road, Tividale, Oldbury, B69 1QP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cheshire Care Services Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Dimensions North Midlands Domiciliary Care Office (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    The Little Robins Care Services Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Arca Healthcare Limited Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Cheshire Care Services Ltd Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Dimensions Midlands Domiciliary Care Office Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G

See all home care services in Sandwell

See all home care services in Oldbury