Rated Care Homes

Deep Heart Care Wiltshire

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89 of 98

    rated home care services in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Deep Heart Care Wiltshire: inspection record

Home care, Wiltshire

Rated Good in May 2026.

Deep Heart Care Wiltshire: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bluebird Care (Wiltshire North) Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Safe Care Good, 1.8 miles away
  3. –
    Spire Homecare (North Wiltshire) Not yet rated, 2.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Everlife (Wiltshire) Good, 2.5 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 May 2026 (assessment visit 27 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 31 March to 14 April 2026. Deep Heart Care Wiltshire is a domiciliary care agency providing support to adults of all ages and people living with dementia. At the time of the assessment the service was supporting 6 people.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was completed to follow up on breaches found at previous assessments for good governance and failing to notify Care Quality Commission (CQC). At this assessment we found improvements had been made with governance systems, so the provider is no longer in breach of this regulation. However, we found some incidents which had not been notified to CQC, so the provider remains in breach of this regulation. Not all incidents had been shared with the local authority or CQC and there was not a consistent approach to learning from all incidents.

Checks for quality and safety were being regularly completed which identified actions for improvements. Actions were being discussed by management and shared with staff, however, the provider did not have a robust system to keep track of the actions and monitor completion. The provider completed unannounced spot checks and regularly asked people for their feedback about their care and support.

Risks to people’s safety had been identified. Staff had guidance on how to provide support however, this was not consistent and some environmental risks had not been assessed. The provider took action to address these shortfalls during the assessment.

Medicines were managed safely. An electronic medicines management system was used which enabled office staff to identify any gaps in recording. People had personalised care and risk management plans. These provided staff with guidance on how to support people safely. There was step by step guidance about the care visits for staff to follow. This included person-centred details on people’s likes and dislikes.

There were enough staff to cover the planned care visits. Staff had been recruited safely and provided with training. Staff had regular supervision and assessments of their competence. The provider made sure staff had access to personal protective equipment.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to failing to notify Care Quality Commission of incidents as required by law.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 5 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
9605956 (opens Companies House)

Deep Heart Care Ltd runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Deep Heart Care Ltd

  1. RI
    Northampton Requires improvement. Home care, West Northamptonshire, East Midlands

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Deep Heart Care Wiltshire provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Deep Heart Care Wiltshire.
When was Deep Heart Care Wiltshire last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Deep Heart Care Wiltshire was published on 5 May 2026.
Who runs Deep Heart Care Wiltshire?
Deep Heart Care Wiltshire is run by Deep Heart Care Ltd. It runs 2 services in England, 1 of them in the South West.
What is Deep Heart Care Wiltshire's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
07758 365454
Address
15 Silver Street, Bradford-on-avon, BA15 1JZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bluebird Care (Wiltshire North) Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Safe Care Good, 1.8 miles away
  3. –
    Spire Homecare (North Wiltshire) Not yet rated, 2.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Everlife (Wiltshire) Good, 2.5 miles away

See all home care services in Wiltshire