Rated Care Homes

A PL+US Caring Service

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 258 of 298

    rated home care services in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

A PL+US Caring Service: inspection record

Home care, Essex

Rated Good in November 2023.

A PL+US Caring Service: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    QV Care Services Ltd - Main Office Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Georges Ltd Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Radis Community Care (Helen Court) Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Support Hands Domiciliary Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Essex

See all home care services in Witham

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 3 November 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

A PL+US Caring is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 16 people using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People and their family members were positive about the staff and management of the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Governance systems were in place to monitor and maintain the service. However, recording and information systems were not always organised in a way to ensure the effective oversight of the service.

We have made a recommendation the provider consider best practice guidance in managing records and information.

Staff told us they felt supported by the management team and all worked well together. Lessons had been learnt when things had gone wrong and learning was shared with staff to improve the service.

People received safe care from staff who knew them well. There was a safeguarding policy in place and the registered manager and staff knew how to identify and report any concerns.

Risks to people's health and safety had been completed. The provider was in the process of reviewing their risk assessment process and recording to ensure it was robust.

The service had enough staff to meet the needs of the people using the service. Staff had been safely recruited.

Staff supported people with their medicines. People told us they received their medicines on time. Staff had access to personal protective equipment and there were effective infection prevention and control measures in place.

Staff had received an induction and training to enable them to meet people's needs. We saw a system of spot checks and ongoing training was in place for staff in order to carry out their role.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were caring, kind and friendly. They provided care and support to people in a respectful and compassionate way.

The service carried out an assessment of each person's needs and how they liked to be cared for and care plans included guidance for staff on how to meet those needs.

There was a process in place for dealing with complaints which were dealt with effectively.

People's nutritional needs were met. They received support to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet. No-one at the service was receiving end of life care.

The provider sought support and liaised with health and social care professionals when needed. As a result, staff met people's need safely and effectively.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 3 November 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does A PL+US Caring Service provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for A PL+US Caring Service.
When was A PL+US Caring Service last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for A PL+US Caring Service was published on 3 November 2023.
Who runs A PL+US Caring Service?
A PL+US Caring Service is run by Mrs Lesley Wheeler.
What is A PL+US Caring Service's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 November 2023.

Contact

Phone
01376 515686
Address
Ground Floor Brooklet House, 122 Newland Street, Witham, CM8 1BA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    QV Care Services Ltd - Main Office Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Georges Ltd Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Radis Community Care (Helen Court) Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Support Hands Domiciliary Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in Essex

See all home care services in Witham