Rated Care Homes

Excellence Healthcare

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 37 of 162

    rated home care services in Birmingham are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Excellence Healthcare: inspection record

Home care, Birmingham

Rated Requires improvement in March 2026, down from Good.

Excellence Healthcare: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Benedon Healthcare Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Calvic Enterprises Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Benedon Healthcare Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Calvic Enterprises Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Choice Health Care - Birmingham Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Choices Care Ltd (Birmingham) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Comfort Homes and Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

See all home care services in Acocks Green

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 March 2026 (assessment visit 2 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Inspection: 06 January to 26 January 2026. The inspection included two site visits which took place on the 06 and 14 January 2026, with additional information and evidence reviewed remotely. We looked at 5 key questions: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Excellence Healthcare is a domiciliary care agency and provides personal care to people living in their own homes, including people living with dementia, people with sensory impairment, people with physical disabilities and autistic people or people with a learning disability.

CQC only inspects where people are receiving the regulated activity personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection 4 people were receiving support with personal care.

Although the service was not supporting autistic people or people with a learning disability at the time of our assessment, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

The assessment was prompted because of the length of time since our last inspection in 2018.

We found 3 breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, staffing, and good governance. We looked at all 5 key questions: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.

The provider had governance systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service, but these were not always effective. Care plans and risk assessments were in place to support people to manage risks. These needed some development, for risks to be managed effectively, and so staff had the guidance needed to support people safely. Recruitment checks were in place to help ensure staff employed were suitable to care for people. However, the provider did not complete all the required pre-employment checks on staff who had worked in care before, to ensure their suitability for the role. This meant there was a risk that people might receive care from unsuitable staff.

Right Support - Staff ensured they communicated and shared information with people in a way they could understand. People were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Governance systems and audits were not always effective in identifying or addressing areas for improvement. New staff were not always recruited robustly.

Right Care - Staff followed current best practice guidelines regarding infection prevention and control. People told us staff were kind and caring and staff protected their privacy and dignity.

Right culture–Governance systems were not robust. People spoke highly of staff members. Staff understood people and their needs well, and escalated concerns appropriately. Staff received safeguarding training and understood their roles in protecting people from the risk of abuse or avoidable harm. The provider raised and escalated safeguarding’s and concerns about people’s needs effectively.

The provider told us they would take action to address concerns raised during the inspection. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 3 March 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 March 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 19 May 2018. Latest assessment published 3 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Excellence Healthcare provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Excellence Healthcare.
When was Excellence Healthcare last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Excellence Healthcare was published on 3 March 2026.
Who runs Excellence Healthcare?
Excellence Healthcare is run by Mr Adekunle Abayomi Kalejaiye.
What is Excellence Healthcare's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 March 2026.

Contact

Address
Fairgate House, 205 Kings Road, Tyseley, Birmingham, B11 2AA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Benedon Healthcare Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Calvic Enterprises Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Benedon Healthcare Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Calvic Enterprises Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Choice Health Care - Birmingham Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Choices Care Ltd (Birmingham) Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Comfort Homes and Care Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

See all home care services in Acocks Green