Rated Care Homes

Bosun Care Limited

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 87%

    of rated home care services in Gloucestershire are Good or Outstanding (91% across the South West, 88% across England).

Bosun Care Limited: inspection record

Home care, Gloucestershire

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Bosun Care Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: P & N Healthcare Services Ltd - Gloucester (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Multilink Management Care Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Extra Care Staffing Solutions - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Medicare Support & Housing Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Multilink Management Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Transforming Minds - Main Office Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Gloucester

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 February 2026 (assessment visit 12 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 13 October and 5 November 2025. Bosun Care Ltd provides a supported living service, providing care and support to adults who live with mental health difficulties, learning disabilities and autism.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Bosun Care Ltd is registered to deliver homecare and supported living and provides the regulated activity of personal care to people living in their own homes to adults who live with mental health difficulties, learning disabilities and autism. CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care’; such as help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 4 people using the service who were receiving personal care.

The assessment was carried out due to emerging risks about the service and in part by a notification of an incident following which a person using the service died. This incident is subject to further investigation by CQC as to whether any regulatory action should be taken. As a result, this inspection did not examine the circumstances of the incident.

The service had been previously inspected and rated good at the provider’s previous registered location. This was the first assessment of this service under the provider’s new registered location. Therefore, we assessed all quality statements across the safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led key questions under the provider’s new registered location. As a result of this assessment, we rated the service as requires improvement. We found 3 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to the management of people’s medicines, person centred care and the service’s governance systems including their record keeping.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

We found the service did not fully understand or apply the principles of the ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture guidance, and the Real Tenancy Test, which is the guidance CQC follows to ensure that people in supported living arrangements have genuine human and tenancy rights.

We were not assured that people received person-centred care based on their choices and preferences. We found people had been supported to access the community and to attend a range of activities in line with their needs and preferences; however, it was not clear from people’s care records and the providers auditing systems that this had been a consistent approach in the support they received to live a meaningful life and in a home of their choice. Therefore, it was not clear how people had consistently been given real choices and control over their tenancy and how they wished to live their life.

Records relating to the planning and delivery of people’s care records were not always complete and detailed. The management of people’s medicines were not always explicitly clear, putting people at risk of receiving inappropriate care and medicines.

The provider’s oversight and records of staff training, recruitment, support and development needed to improve to demonstrate people were supported by qualified, competent staff which had been recruited safely.

People were supported by a team who knew them well. Staf spoke of people with kindness and compassion. There were regular opportunities for people and their relatives to provide feedback about their care and support.

The management team carried out regular site visits and undertook governance checks to help them monitor people’s support needs and well-being. Incidents were investigated and actions and learnings were carried out; however, we were not ensured there was a shared learning culture across the service and CQC had been notified of all relevant incidents.

The provider has been proactive since our assessment and addressed our feedback and implemented a service improvement plan. However, further time was needed for the provider to embed their governance strategies and action plan for the supported living service.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment of the provider’s previous registered location, we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the management of people’s medicines

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment of the provider’s previous registered location, we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment of the provider’s previous registered location, we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment of the provider’s previous registered location, we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment of the provider’s previous registered location, we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance of the service.

Ratings by service

The Care Quality Commission rates each kind of service at this location separately.

Ratings by service for Bosun Care Limited
ServiceRatingDate SafeEffectiveCaringResponsiveWell-led
Homecare No rating Safe: No ratingEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: No rating
Supported Living No rating Safe: No ratingEffective: No ratingCaring: GoodResponsive: No ratingWell-led: No rating

Questions to ask the service

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 19 May 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10089370 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Gloucestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bosun Care Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Bosun Care Limited.
When was Bosun Care Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bosun Care Limited was published on 4 February 2026.
Who runs Bosun Care Limited?
Bosun Care Limited is run by Bosun Care Limited.
What is Bosun Care Limited's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Phone
01453 350654
Address
Winget House, 8 Beaufort Buildings, Spa Road, Gloucester, GL1 1XB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: P & N Healthcare Services Ltd - Gloucester (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Multilink Management Care Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    Extra Care Staffing Solutions - Main Office Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Medicare Support & Housing Ltd Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Multilink Management Care Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Transforming Minds - Main Office Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Gloucester