Rated Care Homes

Precious Homes Bedfordshire

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2017, most recently Requires improvement in August 2023.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 5 of 27

    rated home care services in Central Bedfordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Precious Homes Bedfordshire: inspection record

Home care, Central Bedfordshire

Rated Requires improvement in August 2023.

Precious Homes Bedfordshire: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Frogmore Road (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Combined Care Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    3 Bromley Gardens Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Azelea Care Solutions Ltd Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Lloyds Care Solutions Limited Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Frogmore Road Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Biggs Healthcare Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Central Bedfordshire

See all home care services in Houghton Regis

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 August 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Precious Homes Bedfordshire (AKA Treow House) is a domiciliary care agency and supported living service, providing personal care for adults with a learning disability, autistic people, and people with mental health needs, in their own homes.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Treow House comprises of 22 one-bedroom flats, with a shared communal living room and garden. Staff also support individuals in their own homes through an 'outreach support in the community' service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection the service was supporting 21 people. Of these, 9 people were receiving personal care.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

What inspectors found

Although improvements had been made, the service was not yet able to demonstrate they were consistently meeting the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture:

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Right Support: Daily records demonstrated improvements in the way some staff recorded the care and support provided. However, there were still entries that lacked personalised information and read as a list of tasks carried out by staff. Senior staff were checking these regularly to address this. Staff enabled people to access routine and specialist health and social care support in the community. However, more work was needed to ensure people received good oral healthcare. People's care and support plans reflected their range of needs, and this promoted their wellbeing. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Improvements had been made to learn lessons from incidents; to see how they might be avoided or reduced in future. Staff helped people to live in a clean and well-maintained environment that met their sensory needs. Staff supported people to make decisions following best practice in decision-making. Senior staff carried out regular spot checks and audits to support with making sure people received their medicines in a safe way and as prescribed.

Right care: Further work was needed to ensure all staff had the skills to communicate with and understand people who had individual ways of communicating such as using body language, sounds, Makaton (a form of sign language), pictures and symbols. People did not consistently receive care which focused on their aspirations, quality of life, and followed best practice. Some people did not yet routinely take part in activities. New activity planners had been introduced to support people to try new activities which enhanced and enriched their lives. Staff had identified potential goals for people, however, there was little evidence of people's involvement, progress, or measurable steps to achieve their goals. More work was needed to ensure people were supported to increase their independent living skills too. People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people's privacy and dignity. Staff understood and responded to people's individual needs. Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse, and they knew how to apply it. There were enough staff to meet people's needs, and to keep them safe.

Right culture: Work was in progress to ensure people were consistently supported by staff who understood best practice in relation to the wide range of strengths, impairments or sensitivities people with a learning disability and/or autistic people may have. The service was not always proactive in enabling people and those important to them to provide feedback and develop the service. Throughout the inspection the registered manager and senior team spoke openly and honestly about what had been achieved since the last inspection and what still needed to be done. They were open to feedback and acted on this in a timely way. An improved recruitment process had been introduced to ensure staff were suitable to work with people. The provider had recently introduced a new auditing system to check the quality of the service provided to people. The new system included all the areas CQC assess when inspecting services.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 11 August 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 11 August 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 11 August 2023. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 11 August 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michelle Fenn
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 11 August 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Precious Homes LimitedBrand: Precious Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02981404 (opens Companies House)

Precious Homes Limited runs 9 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Precious Homes Limited

  1. G
    Precious Homes East London Good. Home care, Newham, London
  2. G
    Precious Homes Limited Good. Home care, Haringey, London
  3. G
    Prince Regent House Good. Care home, Newham, London
  4. G
    Vermont House Good. Care home, Birmingham, West Midlands

See all 9 services run by Precious Homes Limited

Getting help from Central Bedfordshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Precious Homes Bedfordshire provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Precious Homes Bedfordshire.
When was Precious Homes Bedfordshire last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Precious Homes Bedfordshire was published on 11 August 2023.
Who runs Precious Homes Bedfordshire?
Precious Homes Bedfordshire is run by Precious Homes Limited. It runs 9 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England.
What is Precious Homes Bedfordshire's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 11 August 2023.

Contact

Phone
01582 863229
Address
Treow House, Parkside Drive, Houghton Regis, Dunstable, LU5 5QL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Frogmore Road (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Combined Care Ltd (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. –
    3 Bromley Gardens Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Azelea Care Solutions Ltd Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. –
    Lloyds Care Solutions Limited Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Frogmore Road Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Biggs Healthcare Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all home care services in Central Bedfordshire

See all home care services in Houghton Regis