Rated Care Homes

Vermont House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Good in April 2020.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 184 of 245

    rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.

Vermont House: inspection record

Care home, 9 beds, Birmingham

Rated Good in April 2020.

Vermont House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Hafod Nursing Home Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Hafod Residential Home Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Abbeyfield House Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    The Manse Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Orchard House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Royal Sutton Coldfield

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 3 April 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Vermont House is registered to provide support to up to nine people and there were five people using the service at the time of our inspection. The service is larger than recommended by best practice guidance. However, we have rated this service good because they had arranged the service in a way that ensured people received person-centred care and were supported to maximise their independence, choice, control and involvement in the community.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was working in accordance with Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

The service was a large home, bigger than most domestic style properties. The building design fitted into the residential area as there were other large domestic homes of a similar size. There were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom, cameras, industrial bins or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

What inspectors found

Timely action had not been taken by the provider to ensure people lived in a safe and well-maintained home. Following our inspection visit the provider did act and replaced fire doors to ensure the home was safe and began the renewal programme that had been developed.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People felt safe, and staff provided support that met their individual needs. Staff knew how to escalate concerns and were aware of potential risks when providing support. People received their medicines when they needed them. Staff wore gloves and aprons when needed to ensure they protected people from cross infection. Systems were in place to review incident and accidents to see if there were any lessons to learn from these.

Staff felt valued and supported in their roles and confirmed they had the training they needed to support people effectively. People's healthcare needs were monitored and met, and staff worked in partnership with healthcare professionals. People, as much as practicably possible, had choice and control of their lives and staff were aware of how to support them in the least restrictive way and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People and relatives made positive comments about the staff that supported them, describing them as friendly and supportive.

The outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right

Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent.

A complaints procedure was in place and people and their relatives knew how to raise concerns and felt confident these would be addressed. People, relatives and staff thought the service was managed well and told us positive changes were being made since the arrival of the new registered manager. The registered manager was described as approachable, supportive and open and transparent in the way they managed the service. Systems were in place to monitor the delivery of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 April 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joanne Shaw
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 3 April 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Precious Homes LimitedBrand: Precious Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02981404 (opens Companies House)

Precious Homes Limited runs 9 services in England, 4 of them in the West Midlands. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Precious Homes Limited

  1. G
    Precious Homes East London Good. Home care, Newham, London
  2. G
    Precious Homes Limited Good. Home care, Haringey, London
  3. G
    Prince Regent House Good. Care home, Newham, London
  4. RI
    Precious Homes Bedfordshire Requires improvement. Home care, Central Bedfordshire, East of England

See all 9 services run by Precious Homes Limited

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Vermont House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Vermont House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Vermont House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Vermont House.
When was Vermont House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Vermont House was published on 3 April 2020.
Who runs Vermont House?
Vermont House is run by Precious Homes Limited. It runs 9 services in England, 4 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Vermont House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 April 2020.

Contact

Address
16 Anchorage Road, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B74 2PR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Hafod Nursing Home Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Hafod Residential Home Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Abbeyfield House Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    The Manse Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Orchard House Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Royal Sutton Coldfield