Rated Care Homes

Elite Care 24/7

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 77%

    of rated home care services in Birmingham are Good or Outstanding (82% across the West Midlands, 88% across England).

Elite Care 24/7: inspection record

Home care, Birmingham

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Elite Care 24/7: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wisteria Care Agency Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and First Care Healthcare Ltd (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Wisteria Care Agency Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
  3. –
    3D Healthcare Solutions Limited No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    First Care Healthcare Ltd Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    United Homecare Ltd Good, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 July 2026 (assessment visit 21 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: Onsite assessment commenced 29 April 2026.
Elite Care 24/7 is a domiciliary care agency providing support to people in their own homes.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of the assessment there were 37 people using the service who were in receipt of the regulated activity.
We gave the provider 24 hours’ notice of our intention to visit because we wanted to make sure someone would be at the office who could answer our questions during the inspection.

The onsite inspection took place on 29 and 30 April 2026 to review the quality of care and compliance with legal regulations. We continued gathering feedback from people and their relatives, staff and other professionals.
At the last inspection, the service was rated Requires Improvement. This was because we found the provider needed to make improvements to quality assurance and risk management. We have not identified significant improvements in these areas and at this inspection the service remains rated Requires improvement.


People received compassionate and reliable care from regular staff who knew them well and understood their individual needs and preferences. People and relatives spoke positively about the support provided and most people told us they felt involved in decisions about their care.


The service had effective arrangements to ensure visits were delivered on time, staff felt supported, and people received continuity of care. Staff described management as approachable and responsive, and the provider had invested in new systems to improve quality and oversight.


However, improvements were needed to care planning, risk management, safeguarding oversight and record keeping. Governance systems had not always identified these issues, meaning opportunities to learn and improve were sometimes missed. This had been identified at the previous inspection.


The provider recognised these areas for development and had begun implementing a new electronic care management system and enhanced quality assurance processes. The registered manager was receptive to feedback and took action to address concerns identified during the inspection.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement.

    At this assessment the rating has remained Requires improvement: This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement: This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good: This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement: This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement.
    At this assessment the rating has remained Requires improvement: This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 February 2020. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 4 February 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Iva Deol
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 4 February 2020. Latest assessment published 21 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08123638 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elite Care 24/7 provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Elite Care 24/7.
When was Elite Care 24/7 last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elite Care 24/7 was published on 21 July 2026.
Who runs Elite Care 24/7?
Elite Care 24/7 is run by Temple Mead Care Ltd.
What is Elite Care 24/7's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Address
Regent House, Unit 2, Office 7, 450 Kingsbury Road, Sutton Coldfield, B76 9DD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wisteria Care Agency Ltd (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and First Care Healthcare Ltd (Good, 1.4 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Wisteria Care Agency Ltd Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
  3. –
    3D Healthcare Solutions Limited No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    First Care Healthcare Ltd Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    United Homecare Ltd Good, 1.5 miles away

See all home care services in Birmingham