Rated Care Homes

Your Life (Lymington)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 166 of 205

    rated home care services in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Your Life (Lymington): inspection record

Home care, Hampshire

Rated Good in October 2026.

Your Life (Lymington): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Oakhaven Care Limited Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Home Instead New Forest Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. O
    Bluebird Care (New Forest) Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Kingfisher Home Care Ltd Good, 2.9 miles away
  5. G
    New Forest Homecare Ltd Good, 3.1 miles away

See all home care services in Hampshire

See all home care services in Lymington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 October 2026 (assessment visit 10 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Our view of the service

About the service

Your Life (Lymington) is a domiciliary care service providing support to older people living in their own flats, within a large purpose-built shared building. Not everyone using the service received personal care, which includes support with personal hygiene and eating. At the time of our assessment, the service was providing this regulated activity to 3 people.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

Your Life (Lymington) provides personal care and support to older people living in their own homes.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment from 28 September to 5 October 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard.

People received safe, person-centred care from a service that placed a strong emphasis on maintaining independence, promoting wellbeing and supporting people to remain living in their own homes. People and their relatives spoke positively about the service, describing staff as kind, respectful and reliable. They told us they felt safe, knew the staff who supported them and trusted them to provide care that met their needs.

There were enough staff to meet people’s needs, and visits were scheduled around their daily routines. Contingency plans were in place to help maintain continuity of care. For example, senior staff kept their training up to date and regularly made themselves available to provide care and support when needed. Staff received appropriate training, supervision and competency checks, and spoke positively about the support available from managers.

The provider had effective systems in place to identify, assess and manage risks. Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and worked proactively with health and social care professionals to respond to concerns and reduce risks. Learning from incidents was reviewed and shared with staff through meetings, supervision and ongoing support, helping to promote continual improvement in practice.

Care was planned and delivered in a way that reflected people’s individual needs, preferences and agreed outcomes. Care plans contained detailed information about people’s care requirements, risks, communication needs and preferred routines. The provider kept care plans under review and updated them when people’s needs changed. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of the people they supported and were proactive in recognising and responding to changes in people’s health and wellbeing.

The provider worked effectively with health and social care professionals to help ensure people received coordinated care. Positive examples included supporting people with complex nutritional needs, facilitating access to specialist services and working alongside external organisations to maintain continuity of care. The provider demonstrated a commitment to delivering care in line with current best practice, including developing staff knowledge and skills in mental health support and dementia care.

People were involved in decisions about their care and told us staff respected their choices and sought consent before providing support. Staff understood the importance of promoting people’s rights, dignity and independence and consistently described a person-centred approach that encouraged people to remain in control of their lives. For example, staff understood and respected people’s right to decline or make changes to their care. People were supported to access social opportunities and community-based resources, helping to reduce isolation and maintain connections to their wider social network.

Staff told us leaders were approachable, supportive and actively involved in the day-to-day running of the service. The provider had effective governance and quality assurance systems in place to monitor safety and quality, identify learning opportunities and drive improvement. For example, they had recently implemented an electronic care planning system. This helped improve monitoring systems when overseeing the delivery of care. Overall, the provider demonstrated a positive culture and a commitment to delivering good quality care centred on meeting people's individual needs.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jacqueline Sheppard
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 24 April 2018. Latest assessment published 26 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Yourlife Management Services LimitedBrand: Yourlife Management Services
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07153519 (opens Companies House)

Yourlife Management Services Limited runs 126 services in England, 33 of them in the South East. 101 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 22 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Yourlife Management Services Limited

  1. G
    Corbett Court Good. Home care, West Sussex
  2. G
    Roswell Court Good. Home care, Devon, South West
  3. G
    Weighbridge Court Good. Home care, Essex, East of England
  4. G
    Your Life (Basingstoke) Good. Home care, Hampshire

See all 126 services run by Yourlife Management Services Limited

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Your Life (Lymington) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Your Life (Lymington).
When was Your Life (Lymington) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Your Life (Lymington) was published on 26 October 2026.
Who runs Your Life (Lymington)?
Your Life (Lymington) is run by Yourlife Management Services Limited. It runs 126 services in England, 33 of them in the South East.
What is Your Life (Lymington)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 October 2026.