Rated Care Homes

Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 37 of 52

    rated home care services in Wolverhampton are rated Good, like this one.

Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme): inspection record

Home care, Wolverhampton

Rated Good in February 2020.

Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Rosewood Lodge Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
    MCO Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Bess Care Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    C&V Care Solutions Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Wolverhampton

See all home care services in Bilston

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 12 February 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme) is a short-term intensive support service for people requiring a period of home based reablement. At the time of the inspection 40 people were receiving a service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

People felt safe when receiving support from staff. Staff were aware of how to identify and report concerns for people's safety and well-being. Risks were assessed and managed to reduce the risk of avoidable harm. People received support from a consistent staff team who had been safely recruited. Where things had gone wrong, action had been taken to reduce the likelihood of reoccurrence.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People continued to receive support from staff who were trained and had the skills and knowledge to provide a good quality of care. People's needs were assessed and reviewed to ensure their needs were met. Staff sought people's consent and people were involved in decisions about their support. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People spoke positively about the staff who supported them, describing them as kind and patient. Staff were enthusiastic about the service they provided and spoke about people with respect. People were actively supported to regain or maintain their independence during the short time they received support, and staff respected their privacy.

People received support from staff who understood their needs and preferences. Where people expressed a preference about who should support them, this was respected. People were confident to report any concerns to the registered manager who acted to ensure people received a quality service.

People, relatives and staff expressed confidence in the management of the service. Staff felt supported by the registered manager and were able to give feedback and contribute to the development of the service. The registered manager was aware of their regulatory responsibilities and worked in partnership with other agencies to ensure people's care and support needs were met.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Karen Atkins
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 12 February 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation

City of Wolverhampton Council runs 4 services, all in the West Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by City of Wolverhampton Council

  1. O
    Ernest Bold Resource Centre Outstanding. Care home, Wolverhampton
  2. G
    Bradley Resource Centre Good. Care home, Wolverhampton
  3. RI
    Duke Street Bungalows Requires improvement. Care home, Wolverhampton

Getting help from City of Wolverhampton Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme).
When was Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme) was published on 12 February 2020.
Who runs Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme)?
Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme) is run by City of Wolverhampton Council. It runs 4 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Wolverhampton City Council HARP Team (Home Assisted Reablement Programme)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 February 2020.

Contact

Phone
01902 553452
Address
Lord Street, Bradley, Bilston, WV14 8SD Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Rosewood Lodge Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. –
    MCO Healthcare Limited Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Bess Care Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    C&V Care Solutions Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Wolverhampton

See all home care services in Bilston