Rated Care Homes

Helping Hands Sheffield

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2018, most recently Good in April 2026.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 81 of 85

    rated home care services in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Helping Hands Sheffield: inspection record

Home care, Sheffield

Rated Good in April 2026.

Helping Hands Sheffield: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Holistic Homecare Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Amazing Hands Care LTD No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    TES Homecare Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Solace Prime Care Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Home First Communities Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Darnall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 April 2026 (assessment visit 20 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 27 February to 11 March 2026. Helping Hands Sheffield is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment there were 43 people receiving care and support. The last inspection took place in September 2019; we inspected the service due to the age of the rating. The service has remained good.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Lessons were always learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed to identify trends and patterns and used to mitigate future risks. We saw appropriate referrals had been made to healthcare professionals and staff worked in line with requirements and recommendations they suggested. People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse and staff understood their responsibility to report any concerns.

Risks associated with people's care were identified and managed to keep people safe. Care plans gave step by step instructions for carrying out tasks to ensure staff were following people's wishes, managing risk and delivering safe care. Staff and leaders ensured the care environment was safe and took action to address any potential hazards. Staff were recruited safely and received a thorough induction when they commenced their employment. Staff had access to ongoing training and were supported to progress within the company. People received their medicines as prescribed by staff who were competent and trained to do so.

People's needs were assessed and care delivered in line with people's preferences. People were involved in reviews about their care. People had access to healthcare professionals and care plans reflected their guidance. People were involved in setting goals and achieving outcomes that really mattered to them. Staff and leaders demonstrated a remarkable understanding of what mattered most to people. People were in control of their care and involved in making decisions based on their needs and choices.

The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care. People and relatives told us staff were skilled and motivated to carry out their role. People valued carers and people were appreciative of emotional support.

People were supported by staff who knew them well and understood their needs and preferences. People and relatives had access to information about the service. The provider had a complaints procedure and people were supported to raised concerns. The provider made sure that people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. People and relatives raised concerns regarding communication and said it was difficult to speak with someone and when messages were left, they were not always passed on. They also commented that this had improved with the commencement of the new manager.

The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. There were clear governance systems which supported leaders to identify issues and act on them in a timely way. The provider understood their duty to collaborate and work with partners to ensure people received a seamless service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 24 September 2019. Latest assessment published 13 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Midshires Care LimitedBrand: Midshires Care Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03959933 (opens Companies House)

Midshires Care Limited runs 151 services in England, 15 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 131 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 17 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Midshires Care Limited

  1. G
    Helping Hands Accrington Good. Home care, Lancashire, North West
  2. G
    Helping Hands Aintree Good. Home care, Liverpool, North West
  3. G
    Helping Hands Arnold Good. Home care, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  4. G
    Helping Hands Barnet Good. Home care, Enfield, London

See all 151 services run by Midshires Care Limited

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Helping Hands Sheffield provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Helping Hands Sheffield.
When was Helping Hands Sheffield last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Helping Hands Sheffield was published on 13 April 2026.
Who runs Helping Hands Sheffield?
Helping Hands Sheffield is run by Midshires Care Limited. It runs 151 services in England, 15 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Helping Hands Sheffield's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 April 2026.

Contact

Address
Suite 30B, First Floor, The Quadrant, 99 Parkway Avenue, Sheffield, S9 4WG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Holistic Homecare Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. –
    Amazing Hands Care LTD No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    TES Homecare Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Solace Prime Care Ltd Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    Home First Communities Good, 0.9 miles away

See all home care services in Sheffield

See all home care services in Darnall