Rated Care Homes

Thorough Care Corporation Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 258 of 298

    rated home care services in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

Thorough Care Corporation Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Essex

Rated Good in July 2019, up from Requires improvement.

Thorough Care Corporation Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Alyson Homecare Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Caremark (Southend and Rochford) Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Bristol Road Not yet rated, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bloomsbury Home Care - South Essex Good, 1.6 miles away
  5. –
    Daisy & Iris Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all home care services in Essex

See all home care services in Rochford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 25 July 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service: 268 Ashingdon Road is a domiciliary care agency that provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of inspection 12 people were using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's experience of using this service: People told us they felt safe using the service and valued the fact that they were supported by regular care staff who knew them well. People said they never had a missed call, staff arrived on time and stayed for the full length of the arranged visit and provided support in the way they wanted. People told us that the registered provider who was currently managing the service was helpful and approachable. People told us they had no complaints, were happy with the service they received and would recommend the service to other people.

Risks to people had been assessed with guidance for staff to follow. However, improvements were required in terms of risk recording to make sure people's care records were up to date and reflected people's current needs. Medicines were managed safely by staff who had been trained and assessed as competent. Staff had access to protective clothing to prevent the spread of infection. Sufficient staff were employed who had been safely recruited.

Staff received training, supervision and regular observations of their practice to ensure staff had the knowledge and skills to care for people effectively. People received support to have enough to eat and drink that met their needs and preferences. Staff knew people well and reported any health concerns to the registered provider who made appropriate referrals.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. Policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People told us staff were kind and caring and treated them with dignity and respect. Staff were gentle and compassionate when providing care and support and listened to people. Independence was supported and encouraged.

Improvements had been made to how information about people was collected to help staff get to know people and how they wanted their care and support delivered. There were systems in place to respond appropriately to complaints. Staff had received training in end of life care and feedback from people showed that people and their families received kind and compassionate care.

The registered provider was managing the service whilst a new manager was completing their induction and going through the registration process. Improvements had been made to ensure robust quality assurance mechanisms were in place to monitor the safety and quality of the service. The registered provider had a good level of oversight of their service as often worked out in the field providing care and support to people

and overseeing staff practice. They were pro-active at seeking the opinion of people and staff to drive improvements and ensure people were happy with the service they received.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 July 2019. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kearabiloe Nkomo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 25 July 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10164572 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Thorough Care Corporation Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Thorough Care Corporation Ltd.
When was Thorough Care Corporation Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Thorough Care Corporation Ltd was published on 25 July 2019.
Who runs Thorough Care Corporation Ltd?
Thorough Care Corporation Ltd is run by Thorough Care Corporation Ltd.
What is Thorough Care Corporation Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 25 July 2019.