Haslemere Homecare Ltd
- Home care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2012
- Surrey, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in September 2026.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
177 of 209
rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.
Haslemere Homecare Ltd: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G In Home Care Haslemere & Grayshott Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Surrey and Hants Domiciliary Care Agency Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Maita Care Services Ltd Good, 1.6 miles away
- – Great Life Care Ltd Not yet rated, 3.8 miles away
- G Tender Hands Ltd Good, 6.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 September 2026 (assessment visit 24 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service:
Haslemere Homecare Ltd is a domiciliary care agency. We carried out this assessment on 5 September 2026 to 14 September 2026. There were 96 people using the service at the time of the assessment.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Who the service is for :
The service is registered to support older people, those with physical disabilities, those living with dementia and people with sensory impairments.
Key findings:
This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
The provider demonstrated a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the importance of protecting people’s rights, choice and control. Where people were unable to make specific decisions about their care, staff followed the principles of MCA, including supporting people to make decisions wherever possible, considering their best interests and using the least restrictive option. The registered manager told us, “I've got this little handout I give them staff which includes, a two-stage process of assessing capacity.”
The service had a positive learning culture, and staff were encouraged to raise concerns and report incidents. Safeguarding arrangements were in place, with staff demonstrating an understanding of their responsibilities to protect people from abuse and avoidable harm. One member of staff told us, “I would raise any safeguarding or abuse concern through the appropriate channels. If the concern involved management or I did not feel it had been appropriately addressed, I know there are alternative escalation contacts available within the staff guidance booklet.”
Staff ensured people were involved in decisions about their care and supported them to identify and manage risks in a way that promoted their safety while maintaining their independence and quality of life. One member of staff told us, “People are treated with care, and staff make sure their needs are met rather than simply completing tasks and leaving. We have time to speak with people, listen to them and find out what they want.”
Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs, and staff received appropriate training, supervision and support to carry out their roles safely and effectively. Feedback from staff included, “I have never felt under pressure during calls because there were not enough staff. I do not feel that the service is short-staffed” and “The training is very in-depth and adequate. We receive both online and face-to-face training.”
Leaders undertook environmental checks in people’s homes to identify and manage potential risks, helping to ensure people and staff remained safe when care and support was delivered.
The provider managed people’s medicines safely and effectively, with appropriate systems in place for administration, recording, monitoring and auditing, and staff were suitably trained and competent to support people with their medicines. One member of staff told us, “When administering medicines, I witness the person taking their medication and record the administration on the medicine chart.”
Leaders assessed people before care and support was provided and care plans contained information about their individual needs, preferences and risks. Staff followed evidence-based guidance and worked with relevant health and social care professionals to ensure people's needs were appropriately met. One member of staff said, “I have sufficient information about people’s individual needs and how they should be supported as stated in the care plan.”
Staff ensured people's health and wellbeing were monitored, and there was evidence that changes in people's needs were identified and responded to. One member of staff told us, “We receive updates on our work phones when there are important changes. For example, if a person’s chair has broken and they need to remain in bed, the office or on-call staff will send an update to our work phones so that staff know what has happened and what support is required.”
Staff knew people well and understood their individual needs, preferences and routines. Staff provided support in a respectful and person-centred way and promoted people's dignity, privacy and independence. One member of staff said, “I encourage people to do as much as they can for themselves while providing support where needed. I give people choices and respect the decisions they make.”
Care plans provided staff with information about people's preferences, communication needs and desired outcomes. Leaders sought to respond to people's changing needs and worked with other professionals where additional support was required. A staff member told us, “At the start of a shift, I log into the system and read the person’s notes before providing care. Any changes or new information are recorded there, so I can make sure I am aware of them before supporting the person.”
Leaders had a clear shared direction and positive culture. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and spoke positively about the management team and the care provided. Comments from staff included, “There is always someone available for me to speak to if I have any worries or concerns. I also have a monthly wellbeing check completed by someone from the office who supports staff wellbeing and mental health. It is a really supportive team, and I am very happy working there” and “I feel supported at work. I enjoy the role and feel that I am making a positive contribution by caring for people. I know I can approach the manager or on-call team if I need advice or support.”
Governance systems were in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service, including audits, checks, incident monitoring and feedback. Leaders used information from their systems to identify areas for improvement and there was evidence of learning from incidents, concerns and feedback. One member of staff told us, “I have had an incident , as it happened outside normal working hours, I reported it to the on-call service at the time and completed an incident form. My line manager subsequently followed this up with me.”
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lisa Palmer
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 1 January 2020. Latest assessment published 16 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Haslemere Homecare Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07849152 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Surrey County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Surrey County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 200 1005, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Surrey County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Haslemere Homecare Ltd provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Haslemere Homecare Ltd.
- When was Haslemere Homecare Ltd last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Haslemere Homecare Ltd was published on 16 September 2026.
- Who runs Haslemere Homecare Ltd?
- Haslemere Homecare Ltd is run by Haslemere Homecare Limited.
- What is Haslemere Homecare Ltd's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 September 2026.
Contact
- Address
- Unit 3, Haslemere House, Lower Street, Haslemere, GU27 2PE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G In Home Care Haslemere & Grayshott Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Surrey and Hants Domiciliary Care Agency Good, 1.5 miles away
- G Maita Care Services Ltd Good, 1.6 miles away
- – Great Life Care Ltd Not yet rated, 3.8 miles away
- G Tender Hands Ltd Good, 6.5 miles away