Rated Care Homes

Elite Home Care Service Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 10 of 10

    rated home care services in Hartlepool are rated Good, like this one.

Elite Home Care Service Limited: inspection record

Home care, Hartlepool

Rated Good in June 2026.

Elite Home Care Service Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 June 2026 (assessment visit 14 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 15 May and 2 June 2026. This was an announced assessment. We undertook this assessment due to the age of the rating. Elite Home Care Service Limited is registered to provide personal care and support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received support with personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do; we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 26 people receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

On 21 May 2026, we gathered telephone feedback from people and their relatives and undertook a remote review of documents.

People were supported by consistent, kind and well-trained staff, who knew them well. The provider operated a safe recruitment process, and a comprehensive training programme was in place. Staff received regular supervision and felt supported.

People’s needs were assessed prior to joining the service. This information was used to create care plans. Environmental risks were identified and mitigated. However, associated health risks had not always been recognised. This was addressed by the registered manager.

The service worked with external healthcare professionals to ensure people received join-up care. Medicines were managed safely. People received their medicines as prescribed and as they wished.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff and the management team worked well together, there was a strong ‘team’ ethos.

There were comprehensive systems in place to monitor the quality of care provided, including spot checks, staff competency assessments, and regular audits of medication practices and care records. Systems were in place to record and analyse safeguarding concerns. Whilst safeguarding concerns were referred to Local Authority safeguarding team, information was not always sent to other authorities who needed it. The registered manager addressed this immediately.

Quality assurance systems for the running of the service were effective. The registered manager had already identified further opportunities to improve the quality and monitoring of the service. People, relatives and staff were regularly asked for feedback. The provider had established systems for managing complaints and demonstrated compliance with the duty of candour.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Patricia Hampshire
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 5 November 2019. Latest assessment published 22 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10953245 (opens Companies House)

Elite Home Care Service Limited runs 2 services, all in the North East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Elite Home Care Service Limited

  1. G
    Elite Home Care Service Limited Good. Home care, County Durham

Getting help from Hartlepool Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elite Home Care Service Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Elite Home Care Service Limited.
When was Elite Home Care Service Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elite Home Care Service Limited was published on 22 June 2026.
Who runs Elite Home Care Service Limited?
Elite Home Care Service Limited is run by Elite Home Care Service Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the North East.
What is Elite Home Care Service Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
07452 880051
Address
Office 3B, Stranton House, Robinson House Business Centre, West View Road, Hartlepool, TS24 0BW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)