Rated Care Homes

Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2020.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 31

    rated home care services in St Helens are rated Good, like this one.

Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside: inspection record

Home care, St Helens

Rated Good in September 2026.

Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Best Care Liverpool Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Dorsam Allied Support Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Longway Avenues (LA) Care Ltd - St Helens Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Able Support Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Unite Healthcare Ltd Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in St Helens

See all home care services in Rainhill

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 September 2026 (assessment visit 13 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Apollo Home Healthcare Limited Merseyside is a domiciliary care agency specialising in providing personal and nursing care for people of all ages with complex healthcare needs living in their own homes. There were 21 people using the service at the time of the inspection. The inspection took place from 21 July 2026 until 10 August 2026.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

Processes were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse and harm. Any risks to people were identified. Measures in place to keep people safe used the least restrictive approach.

Staff were recruited safely and people were supported by a core team of skilled and experienced staff. People were involved in the recruitment process and had a choice in which staff supported them.

People received medicines in a safe way, from trained and competent staff. Systems were in place for reporting any accidents and incidents and learning from them.

People’s support needs were assessed from the outset to help ensure their choices were fully understood and respected.

People’s care plans contained detailed guidance for staff on how to provide bespoke care and support to people. Care plans were reviewed regularly to ensure care remained both relevant and effective.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People and family members were involved in decisions about care and support at every opportunity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion, and their privacy, dignity and independence were promoted and respected. People were supported by staff who knew their needs well. Staff had developed strong relationships with people and their significant others.

Processes were in place to ensure people and their significant others were able to express their views and opinions, in a variety of ways.

The leadership of the service was underpinned by a culture which was committed to delivering high quality, safe and person-centred care. Governance processes were used to help identify any shortfalls in practice and monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.

Both leaders and staff worked seamlessly with other external professionals, to help deliver the best possible care for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Melanie Petrillo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 11 February 2020. Latest assessment published 3 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08899431 (opens Companies House)

Apollo Home Healthcare Limited runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the North West. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Apollo Home Healthcare Limited

  1. G
    Apollo Home Healthcare Limited - North Office Good. Home care, Doncaster, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. G
    Apollo Home Healthcare Limited- West Midlands Good. Home care, Shropshire, West Midlands
  3. G
    Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-East Good. Home care, Peterborough, East of England
  4. G
    Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-North West Good. Home care, Rochdale

See all 6 services run by Apollo Home Healthcare Limited

Getting help from St Helens Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside.
When was Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside was published on 3 September 2026.
Who runs Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside?
Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside is run by Apollo Home Healthcare Limited. It runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the North West.
What is Apollo Home Healthcare Limited-Merseyside's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01744 747599
Address
Mereone, Mere Grange, Elton Head Road, Leaside, St. Helens, WA9 5GG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Best Care Liverpool Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Dorsam Allied Support Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. –
    Longway Avenues (LA) Care Ltd - St Helens Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Able Support Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Unite Healthcare Ltd Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in St Helens

See all home care services in Rainhill