Rated Care Homes

Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove)

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 70 of 83

    rated home care services in Worcestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove): inspection record

Home care, Worcestershire

Rated Good in June 2023.

Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove): inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 6 June 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove) is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. The service provides support to people who may have dementia, people who may have an eating disorder, people who may misuse drugs and alcohol, people who may have mental health needs and people who may have a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our inspection there were 57 people using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

What inspectors found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Right Support: Model of Care and setting that maximises people's choice, control and independence

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were recruited in line with the provider's policy with pre-employment checks completed. Staff had been trained and had the skills to support people. However, further training was needed in specific areas, such as textured modified diets. Staff had received training to support people with learning disabilities and/or autistic spectrum disorders, however the provider acknowledged this was basic training and more in-depth training would be given.

Right Care: Care is person-centred and promotes people's dignity, privacy and human rights

People told us they felt safe and supported by the staff who cared for them. People said they felt safe with staff in their homes. Staff understood how to protect people from the risks of abuse and how to report any concerns. People's care, treatment and support plans gave staff the information they needed to provide safe care. People's care plans provided detail on how staff should support people in the right way to keep them safe. Staff ensured people's rights and dignity were promoted and protected within the agreed risk management plans of care. Infection, prevention and control was managed well.

Right Culture: The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensure people using services lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives.

The provider had good oversight of the service. Quality checks took place and identified where improvements were needed and actions were taken. The provider had ensured we (CQC) were informed about incidents we should be legally told about. Feedback was sought from people, relatives and staff about how they felt about the service they received. This feedback was positive about the hands-on caring approach by staff. The provider was open to feedback and was willing to learn lessons and make further improvements to strengthen the quality of the service. Staff felt valued and said they felt supported by the provider and manager.

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Andrew Toon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 June 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11410782 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Worcestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove) provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove).
When was Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove) last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove) was published on 6 June 2023.
Who runs Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove)?
Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove) is run by GG Total Care Ltd.
What is Caremark (Redditch and Bromsgrove)'s CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 June 2023.