Home Instead
Home care, Bexley
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Home Instead: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2022.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Rated Good in February 2022.
The latest rating was published about 5 years ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 19 Good home care services in Bexley, out of 32 with a rating.
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 February 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Home Instead is a domiciliary care agency (DCA). The service provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. At the time of our inspection 30 people were using the service, some of whom were living with the experience of dementia.
Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.
What inspectors found
People and their relatives were complimentary about the service. People told us they would recommend the service to others because it was well-led. The management and leaders were passionate about providing an innovative and excellent service. Care and support was 'person centred' and the management team supported, motivated and appreciated staff. The service had established good links in the community and had partnered with key organisations including charitable organisations in giving back to the local community. The service operated with a positive atmosphere, and an inclusive and open culture which encouraged people and their relatives to feedback on the standard of care provided.
People received care and support which was safe and personalised to their needs. Staff understood their responsibility to protect people in their care from abuse and neglect, and to report any concerns they had. Risks to people had been identified, assessed and appropriate management plans were in place which provided staff with guidance on how to mitigate risks. Medicines were managed safely, and staff followed appropriate infection control procedures to minimise the risk of infections to the people they supported. Enough staff were available and deployed to meet people's needs.
Read the full summary
A comprehensive needs assessment was carried out to ensure people's needs could be met. People were supported by staff who had been supported through induction, training, supervision and an annual appraisal. They were supported to maintain good health; eat healthily and access healthcare services when required. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People were supported by staff who were kind and caring, respected their privacy and dignity, and promoted their independence. They were empowered to make day-to-day decisions for themselves and to make their own choices about how they would like to live their lives. Staff understood the Equality Act 2010 and applied this to the way they worked.
People and their relatives knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy and told us their concerns and complaints were addressed promptly. People's communication needs had been assessed and met. People were supported to maintain and develop relationships with those important to them to minimise the
risk of social isolation. The service encouraged people to be engaged in social and leisure activities to keep them stimulated.
Questions to ask the service
- The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | St Fidelis House, St. Fidelis Road, Erith, DA8 1AT |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Erith, Bexley |
| Phone | 01322 923750 |
| Registered manager | Ram Chandra Thapa |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 1 inspection report, latest 11 February 2022 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Dartford Home Care Ltd |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 11868286 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- – Nayom Care Agency Limited Home care, 0.2 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Carers 4 U Ltd Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- G Crossroads Care South East London Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- G 30 Aperfield Road Home care, 0.8 miles awayGood
- – Buneto Healthcare Ltd Home care, 0.8 miles awayNot yet rated
Getting help from London Borough of Bexley
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Bexley
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8303 7777, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Bexley
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Home Instead provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Home Instead.
- When was Home Instead last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Instead was published on 11 February 2022.
- Who runs Home Instead?
- Home Instead is run by Dartford Home Care Ltd.
- What is Home Instead's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 11 February 2022.