Woodlands Care Centre
- Care home
- 109 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Fen Ditton, Cambridgeshire, East of England
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
This month
The latest rating was published.
10 of 121
rated care homes in Cambridgeshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Woodlands Care Centre: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in October 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Langdon House (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Alex Wood House (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Langdon House Good, 0.5 miles away
- – Sherbourne Lodge Care Services Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Alex Wood House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Buchan House Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Pauline Burnet House Good, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 October 2026 (assessment visit 12 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 21 July 2026 to 10 September 2026. The service is a nursing home providing support to older people, some of whom were living with dementia and/or physical disabilities. We carried out this inspection in response to concerns we had received about the service and because it had not been inspected for some time. We found 4 breaches of regulation relating to safe care and treatment, safe staffing, dignity and respect and good governance.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People were not always protected from the risks of unsafe care. Care plans and risk assessments were not always accurate, complete or reflective of people’s current needs, which meant risks were not consistently identified, assessed or managed. Environmental hazards, food hygiene concerns and unresolved infection prevention and control issues further increased risks to people’s safety and wellbeing.
People, relatives and staff consistently raised concerns about staffing levels, reporting delays in care and reduced opportunities for meaningful engagement and person-centred support. Staffing levels did not always reflect the complexity of people’s needs, and a reliance on agency staff affected continuity and consistency of care. Staff also reported limited support, supervision and development opportunities, contributing to low morale and concerns about their ability to meet people’s needs effectively.
People had access to healthcare professionals when required, and medicines were managed safely. However, staff did not always have sufficient guidance to support people with long-term health conditions, monitor changes in their wellbeing or respond appropriately to identified risks. As a result, care was not always planned or delivered in line with people’s assessed needs.
Peopledid not always receive care that was kind, compassionate and person-centred. Some people and relatives raised concerns about staff responsiveness, and we observed occasions where people’s privacy and dignity were not fully respected. People were not always involved in decisions about their care and support.
Leadership, culture and oversight required significant improvement. People, relatives and staff described a culture where they did not always feel listened to, valued or supported. Governance systems had failed to identify and address several longstanding concerns, and learning from incidents, complaints and feedback was not consistently embedded into practice. During the inspection, the provider updated its Service Improvement Plan, and the new home manager demonstrated insight into the challenges facing the service and a commitment to improvement. However, many planned actions remained at an early stage, and sustained improvement was needed to ensure people consistently received safe, effective, high-quality care.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and safe staffing.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 19 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 19 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 19 October 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 19 October 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)11 inspection reports, latest 17 December 2021. Latest assessment published 19 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- RCH Care Homes Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02325401 (opens Companies House)
RCH Care Homes Limited runs 9 services in England, 5 of them in the East of England. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by RCH Care Homes Limited
- G Brentwood Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Essex
- G Manton Heights Care Centre Good. Care home, Bedford
- G Park View Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Kent, South East
- G Queens Court Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Essex
Getting help from Cambridgeshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Cambridgeshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 045 5202, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Cambridgeshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Woodlands Care Centre provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Woodlands Care Centre as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Woodlands Care Centre have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 109 beds at Woodlands Care Centre.
- When was Woodlands Care Centre last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Woodlands Care Centre was published on 19 October 2026.
- Who runs Woodlands Care Centre?
- Woodlands Care Centre is run by RCH Care Homes Limited. It runs 9 services in England, 5 of them in the East of England.
- What is Woodlands Care Centre's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 19 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01223 324444
- Address
- Hawkins Road, Cambridge, CB4 2RD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Langdon House (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Alex Wood House (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Langdon House Good, 0.5 miles away
- – Sherbourne Lodge Care Services Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Alex Wood House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Buchan House Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Pauline Burnet House Good, 0.7 miles away