Rated Care Homes

Cedardale Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Cedardale Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 29 beds, Kent

Rated Good in November 2025, up from Inadequate.

Cedardale Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Fairlawn Residential Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Woodgate Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. I
    Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing Inadequate, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    The Grove Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 November 2025 (assessment visit 22 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this comprehensive inspection 11 September 2025. Cedardale Residential Care Home is a residential care home without nursing, providing accommodation and personal care for up to 26 people. At the time of the assessment there were 20 people residing at the service, some living with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At our last inspection, we found 7 breaches of regulation relating to person-centred care, dignity and respect, consent, safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staffing, and good governance. This inspection was carried out to see if the provider had improved in the way they told us they had, and to determine whether they remained in breach of these regulations.

During this inspection, we found a marked change in the quality of care provided by Cedardale Residential Care home. The provider demonstrated that significant improvements had been made which had resulted in a positive impact on people, staff and an improved culture. Therefore, the service is no longer in breach of the above regulations and is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key areas.

People were protected from avoidable harm because clear, comprehensive, person-centred and up-to-date risk assessments were in place, which staff followed closely. Systems and processes to audit and check the safety of both services were in place, and any outstanding actions and/or lessons learned were followed up and embedded into staff practice.

Staff had been recruited safely and were supported to receive the necessary training and development for their role, resulting in a competent and confident workforce. Staff had undergone safeguarding training and put this into practice by demonstrating a good knowledge of which types of concerns needed reporting.

Medicines practice required improvement, however, was significantly safer than at the previous inspection, and staff worked closely with external health professionals to ensure people received appropriate and timely care from other services when they needed it.

We found sufficient staff on duty throughout our inspection which meant that people did not have to wait for care.

Staff took time to get to know people, treated them with dignity and respect, and understood the need to obtain consent or make decisions in a person’s best interests should they lack the capacity to do so for themselves.

The provider had systems and processes in place to understand the diverse health and care needs of people in their care.

Staff told us how much they enjoyed working at the service and that they felt fully supported by the management team who were approachable, proactive and listened.

This service has been in Special Measures since 20/02/2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question as inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michael Lisis
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 26 October 2021. Latest assessment published 14 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04984302 (opens Companies House)

MGL Healthcare Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by MGL Healthcare Limited

  1. RI
    Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement. Care home, Kent

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cedardale Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cedardale Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cedardale Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Cedardale Residential Home.
When was Cedardale Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cedardale Residential Home was published on 14 November 2025.
Who runs Cedardale Residential Home?
Cedardale Residential Home is run by MGL Healthcare Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
What is Cedardale Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 November 2025.