Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing
- Care home
- 62 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Maidstone, Kent, South East
Inadequate
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.
This month
The latest rating was published.
8 of 445
rated care homes in Kent are rated Inadequate, like this one.
Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing: inspection record
Rated Inadequate in October 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove Residential Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bowercroft Care Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Grove Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Bowercroft Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Woodgate Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Cedardale Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2026 (assessment visit 23 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
This assessment took place between 11 and 25 August 2026. We visited the service on 11 August 2026 and reviewed further information off site following this visit.
- Safe Inadequate
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At the time of the inspection 48 people were receiving a regulated activity. The inspection was carried out due to concerns about the management of the service. During the inspection we found 5 breaches of the regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, need for consent, person centred care, good governance and notifying CQC. The service was previously rated good but has now changed to inadequate.
We identified significant concerns about the service.
People were not well protected from the risk of abuse as incidents were not shared with the local authority when they needed to be. Action was not always taken following incidents to put in place mitigations and reduce the risk of re-occurrence. People’s medicines were not well managed. People’s care plans needed to be improved to ensure staff had the guidance they needed to support people. Staff did not have all the training they needed. People were not always well supported to manage risks to their health. We were not assured people’s rights were respected as the registered manager could not assure us people were always being deprived of their liberty lawfully. There was no system in place to ensure people had a deprivation of liberty safeguard in place (DOLs) if needed. Infection risks were not as considered and well managed as they needed to be.
People’s care needs were assessed using best practice tools. However, assessments were not then used to develop robust and holistic care plans. When decisions were made on people’s behalf the right steps were not always taken to ensure decisions were in people’s bests interests. Records were poor and care was not well monitored meaning action was not being taken to assure people’s care was being delivered in line with planned care. How people’s health was promoted could be improved and healthier snacks offered more often.
The management of the service needed to be improved. There were tensions in the staff team which at least one person living at the service was aware of and told us about. Governance had identified some concerns. However, there had been a lack of timely action and improving the service had not been sufficiently prioritised.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we user our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
Inadequate
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate.
This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the ways people’s medicines were managed.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent and person centred care.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate.
This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service and notifying CQC.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 15 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Cara Lean
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 6 December 2023. Latest assessment published 15 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Pilgrims Way Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03676932 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Kent County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Kent County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 03000 41 61 61, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Kent County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 62 beds at Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing.
- When was Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing was published on 15 October 2026.
- Who runs Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing?
- Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing is run by Pilgrims Way Limited.
- What is Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 15 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01622 756635
- Address
- 10 Bower Mount Road, Maidstone, ME16 8AU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove Residential Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bowercroft Care Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Grove Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Bowercroft Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Woodgate Good, 0.2 miles away
- G Cedardale Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away