Rated Care Homes

Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Inadequate, like this one.

Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 62 beds, Kent

Rated Inadequate in October 2026, down from Good.

Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove Residential Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bowercroft Care Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Grove Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bowercroft Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Woodgate Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Cedardale Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2026 (assessment visit 23 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 11 and 25 August 2026. We visited the service on 11 August 2026 and reviewed further information off site following this visit.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of the inspection 48 people were receiving a regulated activity. The inspection was carried out due to concerns about the management of the service. During the inspection we found 5 breaches of the regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, need for consent, person centred care, good governance and notifying CQC. The service was previously rated good but has now changed to inadequate.

We identified significant concerns about the service.

People were not well protected from the risk of abuse as incidents were not shared with the local authority when they needed to be. Action was not always taken following incidents to put in place mitigations and reduce the risk of re-occurrence. People’s medicines were not well managed. People’s care plans needed to be improved to ensure staff had the guidance they needed to support people. Staff did not have all the training they needed. People were not always well supported to manage risks to their health. We were not assured people’s rights were respected as the registered manager could not assure us people were always being deprived of their liberty lawfully. There was no system in place to ensure people had a deprivation of liberty safeguard in place (DOLs) if needed. Infection risks were not as considered and well managed as they needed to be.

People’s care needs were assessed using best practice tools. However, assessments were not then used to develop robust and holistic care plans. When decisions were made on people’s behalf the right steps were not always taken to ensure decisions were in people’s bests interests. Records were poor and care was not well monitored meaning action was not being taken to assure people’s care was being delivered in line with planned care. How people’s health was promoted could be improved and healthier snacks offered more often.

The management of the service needed to be improved. There were tensions in the staff team which at least one person living at the service was aware of and told us about. Governance had identified some concerns. However, there had been a lack of timely action and improving the service had not been sufficiently prioritised.

This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we user our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate.

    This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the ways people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent and person centred care.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate.

    This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service and notifying CQC.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 15 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Cara Lean
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 6 December 2023. Latest assessment published 15 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03676932 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 62 beds at Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing.
When was Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing was published on 15 October 2026.
Who runs Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing?
Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing is run by Pilgrims Way Limited.
What is Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 15 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01622 756635
Address
10 Bower Mount Road, Maidstone, ME16 8AU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Grove Residential Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Bowercroft Care Limited (Good, less than 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Grove Residential Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Bowercroft Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Woodgate Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Cedardale Residential Home Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone