South Collingham Hall
- Care home
- 33 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
9 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
37 of 249
rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
South Collingham Hall: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Village Farm (Outstanding, 3.6 miles away) and An Darach House (Good, 3.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- – Longboat Special Education Limited - Witham Prospect School Not yet rated, 3.1 miles away
- O Village Farm Outstanding, 3.6 miles away
- G An Darach House Good, 3.7 miles away
- G Strawberry Fields Care Home Good, 4.2 miles away
- G Greenfields Close Good, 4.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 July 2026 (assessment visit 11 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Dates of assessment: 16 June to 24 June 2026. This assessment was carried out due to concerns received around staffing and quality of care. South Collingham Hall is a care home which supports up to 33 people at the time of the assessment there were 15 people living at the home, some of whom lived with dementia.
- Safe No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We found significant failings in safety, leadership, governance, and oversight. Risks to people were not consistently identified, assessed, monitored, or mitigated, resulting in people being exposed to avoidable harm.
Care records, risk assessments, and care plans were often inconsistent, incomplete, or not updated to reflect people’s current needs. Safeguarding processes were ineffective, with some concerns not appropriately reported or escalated. The provider could not demonstrate that legal requirements relating to mental capacity, best interest decisions, and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) had been consistently met.
Environmental and infection control risks were present, including trip hazards, strangulation risks, poor cleanliness, and damaged surfaces that could not be effectively cleaned. Staffing levels, particularly at night, were insufficient to meet people’s needs safely, and not all staff had received the training required to carry out their roles effectively.
Medicines were not always managed safely, with concerns relating to storage temperatures, PRN medication protocols, prescribed creams, and systems for monitoring the administration of time-critical medicines.
The provider lacked effective leadership, governance systems, and managerial oversight. Audits and quality assurance processes failed to identify serious concerns, meaning opportunities to improve care and safety were missed. There was no effective learning culture, and incidents, safeguarding concerns, and risks were not consistently reviewed, investigated, or used to drive improvements.
During the assessment, many of the concerns identified were fed back to the provider, who took immediate action to address some of the most significant risks. However, the overall findings demonstrated a service that required substantial improvement to ensure people received safe, effective, and well-led care.
We identified 3 breaches of regulation relating to safe care and treatment, safeguarding and good governance.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were managed, the environment, infection control and obligations under the Mental Capacity Act (2005).
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance of the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Inadequate on 21 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)11 inspection reports, latest 3 December 2019. Latest assessment published 21 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Broadoak Group of Care Homes
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Broadoak Group of Care Homes runs 17 services, all in the East Midlands. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 4 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes
- G Broadoak Lodge Good. Care home, Leicestershire
- G Broadoak Park Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
- G Cherry Tree Cottage Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
- G Cockington House Good. Care home, Nottingham
Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Nottinghamshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 500 80 80
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Nottinghamshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does South Collingham Hall provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists South Collingham Hall as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does South Collingham Hall have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at South Collingham Hall.
- When was South Collingham Hall last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for South Collingham Hall was published on 21 July 2026.
- Who runs South Collingham Hall?
- South Collingham Hall is run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes. It runs 17 services, all in the East Midlands.
- What is South Collingham Hall's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 July 2026.
Contact
- Address
- Newark Road, Collingham, Newark, NG23 7LE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Village Farm (Outstanding, 3.6 miles away) and An Darach House (Good, 3.7 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- – Longboat Special Education Limited - Witham Prospect School Not yet rated, 3.1 miles away
- O Village Farm Outstanding, 3.6 miles away
- G An Darach House Good, 3.7 miles away
- G Strawberry Fields Care Home Good, 4.2 miles away
- G Greenfields Close Good, 4.5 miles away