Rated Care Homes

St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Requires improvement.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 47 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities: inspection record

Care home, 39 beds, West Sussex

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025, down from Outstanding.

St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rustington Convalescent Home (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Ashdown Lodge (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Kensington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blind Veterans UK - Rustington Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rustington Convalescent Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Ashdown Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 September 2025 (assessment visit 28 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 June to 9 July 2025. The service is a residential care home providing support to people of all ages, including people living with cerebral palsy, acquired brain injury, degenerative health conditions, and people with a learning disability.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found 3 breaches of regulations relating to safe care and treatment, person-centred care and good governance.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Systems were not sufficiently robust to ensure identified risks relating to people’s health needs were managed safely. In some instances, there was a lack of information for staff to follow within people’s care plans. The home afforded a safe environment for people, but the home was not cleaned to a high standard. Care provided was not always delivered in a personalised way. Care plans did not provide information that reflected people’s preferences and choices. Information was not always provided in an accessible format. Governance and auditing systems were not sufficiently robust to identify issues found at this inspection or to drive improvements.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and reflected upon so that lessons were learned at this service and also shared with other [SD1]services of this provider. When people moved into the home, the provider worked with professionals who knew people well, so their care and support needs could be assessed and catered for appropriately. People were safe living at the home and protected from the risk of potential abuse or harm. When incidents did occur, the provider took appropriate action. Medicines were managed safely.

People’s relatives were involved in the planning of their family member’s care. People had access to a range of healthcare professionals. Care plans were reviewed regularly to ensure care remained appropriate and current. Capacity assessments were completed.

People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. A range of activities was on offer, including access to IT and dedicated support from staff in the computer room. Staff wellbeing was supported by the management team, including any diverse needs and cultural differences.

People had access to a range of health and care professionals who understood their diverse needs. Complaints were listened to, logged and acted upon. People’s wishes and preferences for their future lives were documented and recorded.

Staff spoke highly of the management team and felt supported in their roles.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. We identified a breach of the legal regulations.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent. We identified a breach of the legal regulations.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating remains good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect, and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met. We identified a breach of the legal regulations.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. We identified a breach of the legal regulations.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 9 September 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 9 September 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 3 July 2019. Latest assessment published 9 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Leonard Cheshire DisabilityBrand: Leonard Cheshire Disability
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
00552847 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
218186

Leonard Cheshire Disability runs 41 services in England, 12 of them in the South East. 25 are rated Good or Outstanding, 14 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Leonard Cheshire Disability

  1. G
    Appley Cliff - Care Home Physical Disabilities Good. Care home, Isle of Wight
  2. G
    Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities Good. Care home, Southwark, London
  3. G
    Bells Piece Supported Living Service Good. Home care, Surrey
  4. G
    Bradbury House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities Good. Care home with nursing, County Durham, North East

See all 41 services run by Leonard Cheshire Disability

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 39 beds at St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities.
When was St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities was published on 9 September 2025.
Who runs St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities?
St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities is run by Leonard Cheshire Disability. It runs 41 services in England, 12 of them in the South East.
What is St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 September 2025.

Contact

Phone
01903 783988
Address
Ilex Close, Rustington, BN16 2RX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rustington Convalescent Home (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Ashdown Lodge (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Kensington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blind Veterans UK - Rustington Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rustington Convalescent Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Ashdown Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington