Rated Care Homes

Kensington Lodge

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in April 2023.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 47 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Kensington Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 18 beds, West Sussex

Rated Requires improvement in April 2023.

Kensington Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rustington Hall (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Ashdown Lodge (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blind Veterans UK - Rustington Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rustington Hall Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Ashdown Lodge Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 20 April 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Kensington Lodge is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 18 people. The service provides support to people living with dementia, mental health conditions and age related frailties. At the time of our inspection there were 14 people using the service.

What inspectors found

Quality assurance processes were not always effective to provide managerial oversight of systems and drive improvements. Areas of improvement highlighted from our last inspection were not fully resolved, records were not always confidentially stored. Audits of medicine management and the environment were not always accurate. It had not been identified some care records contained inconsistencies. The registered manager told us how they would make changes to make improvements on these issues

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People's health risks were not consistently assessed and managed safely. Some assessments were inaccurate, for example, where people had experienced weight loss, associated assessment tools were not always consistent with this. Despite the inaccuracies, care plans were detailed, reflected people's needs and guided staff on how to safely support them. People told us they felt safe and were comfortable to speak with staff or the registered manager if they had any worries or concerns. One relative told us, "I'm thankful to all of them. She's safe and she's adjusted to being there. They've made a great effort with her." Staff received safeguarding training and understood their duty on how to prevent and report potential concerns of abuse.

People received their medicines by staff who were trained and competent to administer them safely. People and their relatives were aware of any changes to their medicines. One relative told us, "It's good and [registered manager] keeps us up to date." People were protected from the risk of infection such as, the COVID-19 pandemic. Staff followed policies to keep people safe, wore personal protective equipment (PPE) and practised good hand hygiene. The registered manager told us they would review their policy of the continued use of face masks to reflect current government guidance.

People were supported by enough staff who knew them well. Staff were recruited safely and received training relevant to their role. People were complimentary of the care staff. One person told us, "I talk to them a lot. I know them." A relative commented, "They've got to know [person] and me. They make an effort to chat. I have a good relationship with them. If I'm not able to go in, they ring and tell me how my relative

has been. They're lovely."

People and their relatives were involved in planning their care and were given opportunities to give feedback on the service. People, their relatives and staff told us they felt comfortable to make suggestions, they were confident the management team would deal with any ideas or problems. Relatives told us staff and management kept them up to date with changes to their loved ones. One relative said, "The way they communicate with me, with the families. They make you feel very comfortable so you can talk freely with them."

Staff and the management team worked closely with health and social care professionals to improve people's care, safety and well-being. One visiting health care professional told us, "When I have asked them to review something they have always followed my instructions. Staff seem caring, I haven't had any concerns."

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 20 April 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 20 April 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ronniel Alarilla
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 20 April 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Mrs K Kalkat and Mr GS Nijjar runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the South East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Mrs K Kalkat and Mr GS Nijjar

  1. G
    Sea Bank House Good. Care home, Lancashire, North West
  2. RI
    Lobswood House Requires improvement. Care home, West Sussex

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Kensington Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Kensington Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Kensington Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 18 beds at Kensington Lodge.
When was Kensington Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kensington Lodge was published on 20 April 2023.
Who runs Kensington Lodge?
Kensington Lodge is run by Mrs K Kalkat and Mr GS Nijjar. It runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the South East.
What is Kensington Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 20 April 2023.

Contact

Phone
01903 786003
Address
53 Broadmark Lane, Rustington, Littlehampton, BN16 2HJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Rustington Hall (Good, 0.7 miles away) and Ashdown Lodge (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Blind Veterans UK - Rustington Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Rustington Hall Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Ashdown Lodge Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington