Rated Care Homes

Ashdown Lodge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2018, most recently Good in June 2026.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Ashdown Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 13 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in June 2026.

Ashdown Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. RI
    Kensington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Oaklands Littlehampton Limited Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Fulford Care & Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 June 2026 (assessment visit 15 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment took place between 14 April 2026 to 14 May 2026. Ashdown Lodge is a small residential care home that is registered to support up to 13 people and provides care to older adults including people living with dementia and those with mild, moderate to severe frailty.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We undertook this inspection as part of our ongoing monitoring to provide an up-to-date assessment of compliance with regulatory requirements and to review the quality of care being delivered. On the day of our visit, the service was supporting 13 people.

There were shortfalls in aspects of the provider`s governance systems, including oversight, record keeping and the monitoring of care related improvements. Following feedback received during the assessment, the provider had begun reviewing governance systems and care records and had developed an action plan to address the areas for improvement. Despite these shortfalls, people’s needs continued to be met, in practice, by staff who knew them well and understood their needs, preferences and routines.

There was an established staff team who spoke confidently about their roles and responsibilities and demonstrated an understanding of how to protect people from harm. Systems were in place to support staff through training, supervision and ongoing development. Leaders promoted an inclusive and supportive culture where people and staff felt listened to, valued and able to raise concerns. Feedback channels were in place and there was evidence that suggestions, complaints and incidents were responded to appropriately with actions taken to support learning and improvements in practice.

The provider worked in partnership with healthcare professionals, including the GP practice and specialist NHS teams to support people's health and well-being. Systems were in place to monitor people`s health needs and support continuity of care, including at the end of life.

The provider took pride in maintaining a safe, comfortable, and aesthetically pleasing environment that people had come to regard as their home. When asked about their experience of living at the service, a person summarised it as, “Great place, great staff, great food”.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained unchanged.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained unchanged.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained unchanged.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained unchanged.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rosanna Chatfield
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 23 May 2019. Latest assessment published 16 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10432334 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ashdown Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ashdown Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ashdown Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 13 beds at Ashdown Lodge.
When was Ashdown Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ashdown Lodge was published on 16 June 2026.
Who runs Ashdown Lodge?
Ashdown Lodge is run by Ashdown Lodge Care Home Limited.
What is Ashdown Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01903 785251
Address
2 Wendy Ridge, Rustington, Littlehampton, BN16 3PJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Fairlight Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    St Bridget's - Care Home Physical Disabilities Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. RI
    Kensington Lodge Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Oaklands Littlehampton Limited Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Fulford Care & Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Rustington