Rated Care Homes

Apple House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 108 of 121

    rated care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole are rated Good, like this one.

Apple House: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

Rated Good in October 2026.

Apple House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Elms Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Redcroft Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    St Anne's Care Home No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Highview Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. O
    Aucklands Care Outstanding, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

See all care homes in Christchurch

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 October 2026 (assessment visit 12 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service
Apple House is a care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 4 people. At the time of our inspection 4 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for
This is a specialist service for people who have a learning disability and/or who are autistic. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 16 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
People told us they felt safe living at Apple House. People, their relatives and social care professionals spoke positively about the care and support provided.
Staff were confident in their abilities to promote positive risk taking which enabled people to be more independent and to live their lives as they chose. A staff member told us, “Working at Apple House is to bring joy. Being able to show people new things and celebrate when they start to learn to do these things for themselves makes me proud. A task that some may think simple, like making the bed, is a chance to promote being independent, time to socialise, time to develop our collaboration with the people we support.”

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

We observed care was delivered in ways that were person-centred and promoted people’s dignity, privacy and human rights. Staff treated people with kindness and respect.

Staff were confident all concerns would be investigated by the registered manager and the provider. Staff knew of external agencies such as the police and local authority safeguarding team who they could contact in the event the concerns were not acted upon.

The service was secure, and we observed checks taking place to ensure only authorised people could enter the property. Staff understood and followed the service’s health and safety procedures, the provider ensured these were fully accessible for staff. Health and safety audits took place regularly and any areas for action were addressed.

Staff told us they felt supported to undertake all requirements of their role with guidance from the registered manager. The provider encouraged all colleagues to live the organisation’s values of; Passion, Empowerment, Respect and Collaboration.
Staff told us, “I am a role model. It is important to live our values and nurture our new staff. This way we are all working to give our very best for the people of Apple House.”
The provider told us they are proud of the flexibility they offer staff. This included access to support 24/7 and training courses run from 7am to 7pm to encourage an improved work/life balance.

The registered manager worked closely with social care professionals to review the medicines of people using the service, in line with the principles of STOMP (Stopping the over medication of people with a learning disability, autism or both). The registered manager told us, “At Apple House, we focus on mindfulness and think about ways to keep active because keeping active is part of a holistic approach that keeps everybody well, people that live here and the staff team. We focus on regular fit breaks and goal setting such as saving some money each week to purchase new gym equipment and it’s had a really positive impact on people’s wellbeing.”
Where necessary, referrals to health services had been made to ensure people maintained a healthy lifestyle, identified goals and had positive outcomes. Instructions for staff on how to achieve this were included in people’s care plan. Each care plan was individual and centred around the person, with input from relatives as appropriate. A social care professional fed back, “I have been very impressed with how hard the registered manager works to improve the individual’s day to day life.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sabrina Lupato
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 15 April 2021. Latest assessment published 14 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Apple House LimitedBrand: National Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05249887 (opens Companies House)

Apple House Limited runs 6 services in England, 4 of them in the South West. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Apple House Limited

  1. G
    Corner Cottage Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
  2. G
    Little Amberwood Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
  3. G
    Redcroft Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
  4. G
    Summerwood Good. Care home, Hampshire, South East

See all 6 services run by Apple House Limited

Getting help from BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Apple House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Apple House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Apple House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Apple House.
When was Apple House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Apple House was published on 14 October 2026.
Who runs Apple House?
Apple House is run by Apple House Limited. It runs 6 services in England, 4 of them in the South West.
What is Apple House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01202 429093
Address
186 Seafield Road, Bournemouth, BH6 5LJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Elms Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Redcroft Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    St Anne's Care Home No overall rating, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Highview Residential Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. O
    Aucklands Care Outstanding, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole

See all care homes in Christchurch