Rated Care Homes

Home Meadow

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in September 2023.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 102 of 121

    rated care homes in Cambridgeshire are rated Good, like this one.

Home Meadow: inspection record

Care home, 49 beds, Cambridgeshire

Rated Good in September 2023.

Home Meadow: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
  3. G
    Midfield Lodge Good, 5.8 miles away
  4. G
    The Cambridgeshire Care Home Good, 5.8 miles away
  5. G
    Primrose Croft Care Home Good, 5.9 miles away

See all care homes in Cambridgeshire

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 14 September 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Home Meadow is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Home Meadow accommodates up to 49 older people in a single-storey building. At the time of our inspection, 46 people were living at Home Meadow. The service is divided into 2 main units with 1 which accommodates people living with dementia.

What inspectors found

The provider's systems had not always identified where improvements were required, for action to be taken, to keep people safe from the risk of infection.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have made a recommendation to the provider to monitor their processes, moving forward, to ensure timely identification and action is taken, when required.

People were at risk of dehydration due to ineffective daily reviews. Furthermore, appropriate risk reducing measures were not contained within care plans for people who required support with diabetes. We found no person had come to harm from these concerns. The registered manager and provider was responsive during the inspection time frame and undertook appropriate reviews.

People told us they felt safe. Relatives told us they felt their family member was safe and well cared for by staff. Staff received training to meet people's needs and had undertaken specific training to help identify and reduce risks associated with falls, severe infections, and health deterioration.

Medicines were administered as prescribed; staff had completed training, and their competency had been assessed. Safe reporting and review systems were in place to monitor incidents and accidents if they occurred. Lessons learnt were reviewed and shared with staff. The provider undertook safe recruitment processes and there were enough staff to meet people's needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

A registered manager was in post, and people, their relatives, and staff felt able to approach them with any concerns and were confident they would be acknowledged and acted upon. The providers systems, overall, allowed for quality monitoring to take place at the service which drove continuous improvements.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 14 September 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Noby Chelathadathil Jacob
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

13 inspection reports, latest 14 September 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Healthcare Homes Group LimitedBrand: Healthcare Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05507277 (opens Companies House)

Healthcare Homes Group Limited runs 29 services in England, 27 of them in the East of England. 25 are rated Good or Outstanding and 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Healthcare Homes Group Limited

  1. O
    Foxgrove Residential Home Outstanding. Care home, Suffolk
  2. O
    Meadow House Nursing Home Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Norfolk
  3. G
    Aldringham Court Good. Care home with nursing, Suffolk
  4. G
    Barking Hall Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Suffolk

See all 29 services run by Healthcare Homes Group Limited

Getting help from Cambridgeshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Home Meadow provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Home Meadow as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Home Meadow have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 49 beds at Home Meadow.
When was Home Meadow last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Home Meadow was published on 14 September 2023.
Who runs Home Meadow?
Home Meadow is run by Healthcare Homes Group Limited. It runs 29 services in England, 27 of them in the East of England.
What is Home Meadow's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 September 2023.