Norton House
Care home, Westminster, 40 beds
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Norton House: inspection record
Rated Good in May 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 4 times since 2015. Rated Good in 2015, 2017, 2019 and May 2026.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2015. The latest rating was published 5 months ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 6 Good care homes in Westminster, out of 6 with a rating.
- Smaller than 6 in 10 care homes in Westminster.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 May 2026 (assessment visit 12 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
This assessment took place on 22 April 2026 and included an unannounced site visit.
The last rating for this service was good, (published on 11 May 2021) and at this assessment the rating has remained good.
Read the full summary
Norton House, a care home without nursing for older adults, including people living with dementia. The service is registered to support up to 40 people and was supporting 36 people at the time of the inspection.
People experienced kind, compassionate and person‑centred care. People and relatives gave consistently positive feedback and told us they felt safe, comfortable and well cared for by staff who knew them well. Observations showed staff interacted calmly and respectfully, took time to reassure people and supported them at their own pace. People were supported to maintain dignity, choice and independence.
Care was effective. Assessments were completed before people moved to the service. These were reviewed as needs changed. Staff demonstrated good knowledge of people’s needs and worked with healthcare professionals to support people’s physical and mental health. People were supported to maintain their mobility, nutrition, hydration and emotional wellbeing, and care plans were adapted when needs changed.
The service was responsive. Admissions and transfers, including from hospital, were well organised and information was shared to support continuity of care. Families were involved and usually kept informed, which helped people feel reassured and supported.
Leaders were visible, approachable and responsive in day‑to‑day practice, including providing hands‑on support during busy periods. Governance systems were in place to monitor quality, safety and performance, and leaders understood their regulatory responsibilities. However, oversight of mandatory training and staff competence was not always effective. The training matrix was not up to date and records showed gaps in mandatory training, including among senior staff and team leaders. While some training was completed following feedback, this was not yet embedded through consistent oversight. We discussed this with the management team and they took action to address these issues and ensure staff completed the relevant training.
Overall, people experienced good care and positive outcomes.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good
This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 10 Arneway Street, London, SW1P 2BG |
|---|---|
| Phone | 020 7976 7681 |
| Website | www.anchor.org.uk |
| Registered manager | Felicia Imafidon |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 7 inspection reports, latest 11 May 2021 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 20 May 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Anchor Hanover GroupBrand: Anchor |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | RS007843 (opens Companies House) |
Anchor Hanover Group runs 2 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Anchor Hanover Group
- G Silk Court Care Home Care home, Tower HamletsGood
Nearest alternatives
- G Garside House Nursing Home Care home with nursing, 0.4 miles awayGood
- – Loveday Belgravia Care home with nursing, 0.9 miles awayNot yet rated
- RI Little Sisters of the Poor - St Peters Residence Care home with nursing, 1 mile awayRequires improvement
- G Orient St Adult Respite Unit Care home, 1.1 miles awayGood
- G Gaywood Street Care home, 1.2 miles awayGood
Getting help from City of Westminster
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at City of Westminster
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 7641 2500
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: City of Westminster
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Norton House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Norton House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Norton House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Norton House.
- When was Norton House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Norton House was published on 20 May 2026.
- Who runs Norton House?
- Norton House is run by Anchor Hanover Group. It runs 2 services in London.
- What is Norton House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 May 2026.