Rated Care Homes

The Paddocks

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

The Paddocks: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in August 2026.

The Paddocks: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brookmead Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    Deerswood Lodge Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Ellwood Place Dementia Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Woodroffe Benton House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. O
    Greensleeves Care Home Outstanding, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Ifield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 August 2026 (assessment visit 22 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The Paddocks is a residential care home that was providing care and support to people with a learning disability. There were 5 people using the service at the time of the assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This is a specialist service for people living with a learning disability and autistic people. People who lived at The Paddocks shared a kitchen, lounge and dining area. This helped create a familiar home environment where staff support people in a more personal and flexible way.

We carried out this assessment on 29 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People received person-centred care and support from a staff team that knew them well and had developed positive, trusting relationships with them over time. Throughout the inspection, people were relaxed and comfortable in the presence of staff, seeking reassurance, interaction and support in a natural way. Staff demonstrated an understanding of people's communication needs, preferences and interests and adapted their approach to meet individual needs. Communication guidance, pictorial tools and personalised support enabled people, including those who didn't use verbal communication, to express choices and remain involved in decisions about their lives. People were supported to access meaningful activities and pursue interests, promoting independence, wellbeing and quality of life.

The service demonstrated the principles of Right Support through person-centred care planning, positive behaviour support and reasonable adjustments that enabled people to achieve positive outcomes. Care plans clearly identified desired outcomes and the support required to achieve them. Staff worked proactively with healthcare professionals and partner agencies to ensure people could access healthcare effectively. People had experienced improved outcomes. These included reduced reliance on psychotropic medicines through STOMP (Stopping over medication of people with a learning disability and autistic people), increased participation in activities and greater confidence in accessing healthcare appointments.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

The service promoted Right Care by ensuring risks were assessed, reviewed and managed in a way that balanced safety with people's rights and independence. Staff understood safeguarding responsibilities and demonstrated a commitment to openness, learning and protecting people from harm. People’s health needs were closely monitored, medicines were managed safely, and specialist guidance from healthcare professionals was implemented consistently. Environmental adaptations, personalised risk assessments and positive behaviour support plans helped people remain safe whilst continuing to lead active and meaningful lives.

The service reflected Right Culture through a stable, consistent and caring staff team that placed people's rights, choices and aspirations at the centre of support. Leaders and staff shared clear values focused on promoting independence, dignity, equality and inclusion. One staff member said, “(They) are very approachable and very supportive if you have any questions.” People were actively involved in decisions affecting their lives, including aspects of their home environment, activities and recruitment processes. The provider demonstrated a commitment to continuous improvement through regular auditing, partnership working and responding to feedback. Staff embraced learning and innovation to improve outcomes and reduce barriers for people. This created an inclusive culture where people were supported to have choice and control, maintain relationships and experience lives that reflected their preferences and goals.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Liliana Agatine
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 4 July 2019. Latest assessment published 10 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Alliance Home Care LimitedBrand: Allied Care Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03067211 (opens Companies House)

Alliance Home Care Limited runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in the South East. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Alliance Home Care Limited

  1. G
    Ashcott Bungalow Good. Care home, Suffolk, East of England
  2. G
    Brownrigg Good. Care home, West Sussex
  3. G
    The Oaks Good. Care home, West Sussex

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Paddocks provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Paddocks as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Paddocks have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at The Paddocks.
When was The Paddocks last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Paddocks was published on 10 August 2026.
Who runs The Paddocks?
The Paddocks is run by Alliance Home Care Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in the South East.
What is The Paddocks's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01293 611776
Address
Paddock Cottage, Rusper Road, Crawley, RH11 0HL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Brookmead Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    Deerswood Lodge Outstanding, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Ellwood Place Dementia Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Woodroffe Benton House Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. O
    Greensleeves Care Home Outstanding, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Ifield