Lee House
Care home, Merton, 27 beds
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Lee House: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2024.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, 2018 and February 2024.
It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published about 3 years ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 34 Good care homes in Merton, out of 35 with a rating.
- Larger than 6 in 10 care homes in Merton.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 February 2024 (assessment visit 11 January 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Lee House is a residential care home providing personal care and support to up to 27 people. The service provides support to older people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 22 people living at the care home.
We conducted our on-site assessment of this service on 17 January 2024 and off-site assessment activity continued until 19 January 2024. We looked at 5 quality statements including Safeguarding; Involving people to manage risks; Safe and effective staffing; Independence, choice and control and Equity in experiences and outcomes.
Read the full summary
Staff and managers understood their duty to safeguard people from abuse and protect them from harm. Staff had been trained to recognise and report the signs of abuse. Managers made sure people were safeguarded from further risk. There was a clear understanding of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and this was only used when it was in the best interest of people using the service.
Staff understood how to reduce safety risks, to keep people safe from injury or harm whilst ensuring people were not subject to any unnecessary restrictions.
There were enough staff on duty to support people and meet their needs. Managers undertook robust checks to make sure staff were suitable to be employed and support people. Staff received regular and relevant training to meet people’s needs.
Staff made sure people were supported to have choice and control and make decisions about how their care was provided. Staff supported people to be as independent as possible and respected their rights. Staff treated people equally and fairly and reduced the risk of them of being excluded from receiving care and support they were entitled to. People’s feedback was used to improve care to reduce any barriers people might experience due to their protected characteristics.
-
Safe
Good
People and those important to them were supported to understand safeguarding and how to raise concerns when they did not feel safe. People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse. Staff understood their duty to protect people from abuse and knew how and when to report any concerns they had to managers and staff.
There was a clear understanding of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and this was only used when it was in the best interest of people using the servicen. People were supported to understand and manage risk. Managers and staff assessed and reviewed safety risks to people regularly and made sure people and those important to them, were involved in making decisions about how they wished to be supported to stay safe. Care plans were clear and provided sufficient guidance to staff to keep people safe.
There were enough staff to support people with their care and support needs. Managers reviewed staffing levels regularly to make sure there were enough suitably skilled and experienced staff deployed throughout the care home at all times. There were sufficient and appropriately trained staff in place to support people and keep them safe. Managers made sure thorough pre-employment recruitment checks were undertaken on all staff to make sure only those that were deemed suitable and fit, would be employed to support people at the service.
-
Caring
Good
People were supported to have choice and control and make decisions about how their support was provided. They were encouraged and helped by staff to do as much as they could for themselves, to maintain their independence. People were supported to understand their rights and how the service would make sure these were respected. People’s friends and families were free to visit them with no restrictions. People were encouraged to take part in a wide range of activities both at the service and in the community which helped support their independence, health and wellbeing.
-
Responsive
Good
People were supported to live in a safe, inclusive environment in which they were treated fairly and free from the fear of being discriminated against. People were supported to understand their equality and human rights and how staff and managers would respect these. Managers made sure staff were given appropriate training and supported to treat people equally and fairly and reduce the risk of them of being excluded from receiving care and support they were entitled to. Managers used people’s feedback to improve care to reduce any barriers people might experience due to their protected characteristics.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 2 Lancaster Avenue, Wimbledon, London, SW19 5DE |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Wimbledon Common, Merton |
| Phone | 020 8946 0369 |
| Website | www.abbeyfield.com |
| Registered manager | Vanessa Clouston |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 5 inspection reports, latest 15 August 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 12 February 2024; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Abbeyfield Society (The)Brand: Abbeyfield Society |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 00574816 (opens Companies House) |
| Charity number | 200719 |
Abbeyfield Society (The) runs 2 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Abbeyfield Society (The)
- G Abbeyfield House - New Malden Care home, Kingston upon ThamesGood
Nearest alternatives
- G Keychange Charity Alexander House Care Home Care home, 0.5 miles awayGood
- O Hallmark Kew House Luxury Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles awayOutstanding
- G Heathland Court Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles awayGood
- G Queens Court Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles awayGood
- G St Teresa's Home for the Elderly Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Merton
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Merton
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8545 4388, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm. Out of hours: 020 8770 5000
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Merton
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Lee House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lee House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Lee House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Lee House.
- When was Lee House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lee House was published on 12 February 2024.
- Who runs Lee House?
- Lee House is run by Abbeyfield Society (The). It runs 2 services in London.
- What is Lee House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 February 2024.