Rated Care Homes

Lee House

Care home, Merton, 27 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Lee House: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, Merton

Rated Good in February 2024.

Lee House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, 2018 and February 2024.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published about 3 years ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 34 Good care homes in Merton, out of 35 with a rating.
  • Larger than 6 in 10 care homes in Merton.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 February 2024 (assessment visit 11 January 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Lee House is a residential care home providing personal care and support to up to 27 people. The service provides support to older people, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 22 people living at the care home.

We conducted our on-site assessment of this service on 17 January 2024 and off-site assessment activity continued until 19 January 2024. We looked at 5 quality statements including Safeguarding; Involving people to manage risks; Safe and effective staffing; Independence, choice and control and Equity in experiences and outcomes.

Read the full summary

Staff and managers understood their duty to safeguard people from abuse and protect them from harm. Staff had been trained to recognise and report the signs of abuse. Managers made sure people were safeguarded from further risk. There was a clear understanding of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and this was only used when it was in the best interest of people using the service.

Staff understood how to reduce safety risks, to keep people safe from injury or harm whilst ensuring people were not subject to any unnecessary restrictions.

There were enough staff on duty to support people and meet their needs. Managers undertook robust checks to make sure staff were suitable to be employed and support people. Staff received regular and relevant training to meet people’s needs.

Staff made sure people were supported to have choice and control and make decisions about how their care was provided. Staff supported people to be as independent as possible and respected their rights. Staff treated people equally and fairly and reduced the risk of them of being excluded from receiving care and support they were entitled to. People’s feedback was used to improve care to reduce any barriers people might experience due to their protected characteristics.

  1. Safe

    Good

    People and those important to them were supported to understand safeguarding and how to raise concerns when they did not feel safe. People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse. Staff understood their duty to protect people from abuse and knew how and when to report any concerns they had to managers and staff.

    There was a clear understanding of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and this was only used when it was in the best interest of people using the servicen. People were supported to understand and manage risk. Managers and staff assessed and reviewed safety risks to people regularly and made sure people and those important to them, were involved in making decisions about how they wished to be supported to stay safe. Care plans were clear and provided sufficient guidance to staff to keep people safe.

    There were enough staff to support people with their care and support needs. Managers reviewed staffing levels regularly to make sure there were enough suitably skilled and experienced staff deployed throughout the care home at all times. There were sufficient and appropriately trained staff in place to support people and keep them safe. Managers made sure thorough pre-employment recruitment checks were undertaken on all staff to make sure only those that were deemed suitable and fit, would be employed to support people at the service.

  2. Caring

    Good

    People were supported to have choice and control and make decisions about how their support was provided. They were encouraged and helped by staff to do as much as they could for themselves, to maintain their independence. People were supported to understand their rights and how the service would make sure these were respected. People’s friends and families were free to visit them with no restrictions. People were encouraged to take part in a wide range of activities both at the service and in the community which helped support their independence, health and wellbeing.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    People were supported to live in a safe, inclusive environment in which they were treated fairly and free from the fear of being discriminated against. People were supported to understand their equality and human rights and how staff and managers would respect these. Managers made sure staff were given appropriate training and supported to treat people equally and fairly and reduce the risk of them of being excluded from receiving care and support they were entitled to. Managers used people’s feedback to improve care to reduce any barriers people might experience due to their protected characteristics.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Lee House
Address2 Lancaster Avenue, Wimbledon, London, SW19 5DE
NeighbourhoodWimbledon Common, Merton
Phone020 8946 0369
Websitewww.abbeyfield.com
Registered managerVanessa Clouston
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 5 inspection reports, latest 15 August 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 12 February 2024; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Lee House
ProviderAbbeyfield Society (The)Brand: Abbeyfield Society
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number00574816 (opens Companies House)
Charity number200719

Abbeyfield Society (The) runs 2 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Abbeyfield Society (The)

  1. G
    Abbeyfield House - New Malden Care home, Kingston upon Thames
    Good

Nearest alternatives

  1. G Good
  2. O
    Hallmark Kew House Luxury Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles away
    Outstanding
  3. G
    Heathland Court Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.7 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Queens Court Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    St Teresa's Home for the Elderly Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Merton

Getting help from London Borough of Merton

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lee House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lee House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lee House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Lee House.
When was Lee House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lee House was published on 12 February 2024.
Who runs Lee House?
Lee House is run by Abbeyfield Society (The). It runs 2 services in London.
What is Lee House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 February 2024.