Rated Care Homes

The Spinnies

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in April 2026.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 186 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

The Spinnies: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in April 2026.

The Spinnies: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Sherwood House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Annesley Lodge Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    The Orchard Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  4. I
    Aldercar Residential Care Home Inadequate, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Beaumont House Care Home Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Hucknall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 April 2026 (assessment visit 20 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 27 February to 4 March 2026. We undertook multiple sites visits to assess this service including a visit out of hours. The Spinnies is a residential care home providing support to younger adults living with learning disabilities and autism, mental health conditions and physical disabilities. The Spinnies was last rated good (published 9 August 2018). This assessment was prompted by the age of the services previous rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Care plans were person‑centred and clearly detailed how people wished to be supported. People’s preferred activities were well documented; however, activity‑specific risk assessments were not always in place. Staff and relatives told us that previous staffing challenges had affected the service, but these had improved following the recruitment of an interim manager, and staff were confident this progress would continue.

Behaviour support plans reflected people’s preferences, including how they communicated. Staff consistently offered, supported, and promoted choice using person‑centred approaches that encouraged people to remain as independent as possible. The provider and staff supported people to personalise their bedrooms and the wider home environment in line with their needs and wishes. Staff demonstrated good knowledge of the people they supported and helped individuals express their feelings and anxieties. Where required, care plans contained clear guidance for staff on how people wished to be supported during periods of stress, frustration, or distress, helping to ensure people remained safe.

People received their medicines safely from staff who understood their needs. When we identified areas for improvement, the management team responded promptly to ensure medication administration records aligned with best‑practice guidance. Audits completed by the management team were effective, and where improvements were identified, these were clearly recorded with action plans already in place for monitoring and further development.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 2 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 9 August 2018. Latest assessment published 2 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05522412 (opens Companies House)

Creative Care (East Midlands) Limited runs 10 services, all in the East Midlands. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Creative Care (East Midlands) Limited

  1. O
    Charnwood House Outstanding. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  2. O
    Sternhill Paddock Outstanding. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  3. O
    The Old Red Lion Outstanding. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  4. G
    Bridle Lodge Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire

See all 10 services run by Creative Care (East Midlands) Limited

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Spinnies provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Spinnies as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Spinnies have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at The Spinnies.
When was The Spinnies last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Spinnies was published on 2 April 2026.
Who runs The Spinnies?
The Spinnies is run by Creative Care (East Midlands) Limited. It runs 10 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is The Spinnies's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 April 2026.